Hi Ludo,
On Thu, 03 Dec 2020 at 18:07, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> This was fixed by c2cc5f0a006fd7797039dae24274833118ea7b47, closing!
Thanks to close this forgotten one. But it does not count for the
“December old bug squashing“ effort. ;-)
Cheers,
simon
This was fixed by c2cc5f0a006fd7797039dae24274833118ea7b47, closing!
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 22:49, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
>>> >> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
>>> >> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
>>> >> > I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't a
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 22:49, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> >> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
>> >> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
>> >> > I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list
>> >>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:41:53PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 21:30, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
> >> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
> >> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
> >> > I've
Hi Efraim,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 21:30, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
>> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
>> > I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list
>> > any
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:12:54PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 13:30, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
> > I've test built
Hi Efraim,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 13:30, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
> I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
> I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list
> anymore.
I thin
I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls
I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below
I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list
anymore.
(ins)efraim@E5400 ~/workspace/guix-1.2.0$ time ./pre-inst-env guix weather -c
1
