Hi Leo,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 10:35 AM Leo Prikler
wrote:
> Hello Jason,
> Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 09:52 -0500 schrieb Jason Conroy:
> > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Leo Prikler <
> > leo.prik...@student.tugraz.at> wrote:
> > > Hi Jason,
> > > Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 09:02 -0500 schri
Hello Jason,
Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 09:52 -0500 schrieb Jason Conroy:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Leo Prikler <
> leo.prik...@student.tugraz.at> wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> > Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 09:02 -0500 schrieb Jason Conroy:
> > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 10:11 PM Leo Prikler <
> > >
Hi Danny,
Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 15:50 +0100 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> [...]
> I agree, if in addition.
>
> (Or if a registry is undesireable, calculate the uids by user name.
> These are the possibilities. If hashing user names is too uncommon
> on
> UNIX elsewhere, I say that we have
Hi Danny,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:50 AM Danny Milosavljevic
wrote:
> > >From the solutions we do have so far, I believe that making user
> > > accounts an explicit part of service configuration (in what shape may
> > > still be up for debate),
>
> Not everything needs to be user configurable.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Leo Prikler
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 09:02 -0500 schrieb Jason Conroy:
> > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 10:11 PM Leo Prikler <
> > leo.prik...@student.tugraz.at> wrote:
> > > Hi Danny,
> > > Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 02:40 +0100 schrieb Danny
> >
Hi Jason,
On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 09:02:18 -0500
Jason Conroy wrote:
> My reaction to this was not that defaults are bad, but that dispersing
> numeric literals throughout the code is.
In general that is not exactly true. What you want is some way to check
the uids for collisions--and putting them
Hi Jason,
Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 09:02 -0500 schrieb Jason Conroy:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 10:11 PM Leo Prikler <
> leo.prik...@student.tugraz.at> wrote:
> > Hi Danny,
> > Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 02:40 +0100 schrieb Danny
> > Milosavljevic:
> > > Hi Leo,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 0
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 10:11 PM Leo Prikler
wrote:
> Hi Danny,
> Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 02:40 +0100 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 00:16:45 +0100
> > Leo Prikler wrote:
> >
> > > > And it indeed is possible to add (uid 4711) in the literal and it
> > >
Hi Danny,
Am Samstag, den 02.01.2021, 02:40 +0100 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 00:16:45 +0100
> Leo Prikler wrote:
>
> > > And it indeed is possible to add (uid 4711) in the literal and it
> > > will work
> > > just fine.
> > I'm aware you're joking, or at lea
Hi Leo,
On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 00:16:45 +0100
Leo Prikler wrote:
> > And it indeed is possible to add (uid 4711) in the literal and it
> > will work
> > just fine.
> I'm aware you're joking, or at least I hope you are,
What? It's perfectly reasonable for a distribution to have stable system
us
Forgot to CC the ML.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Danny,
Am Freitag, den 01.01.2021, 21:22 +0100 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2021 19:44:12 +0100
> Leo Prikler wrote:
>
> > Ah, that puts things into perspective. In other words, the problem
> > is
> > not, that Guix doe
11 matches
Mail list logo
