Hi,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 18:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> So here, a transformation could be applied. For example, build all
>> the dependencies without testing them; at the 'define gnutls' ()
>> step or in the map. Why not?
>
> Sure, but how do you get a user-specified transformation to
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> I am confused. The 'specification->package' returns a regular
> package, right?. And then,
>
> (define gnutls
> (specification->package "gnutls"))
>
> (define dependencies
> (append-map transitive-package-dependencies
> (list guile-gcrypt
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 12:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 14:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >
> >> Guix as returned by ‘guix pull’ and ‘guix time-machine’ depends on
> >> GnuTLS. So here, we have a special case: to build Guix itself, you need
> >> to build GnuTLS
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 14:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Guix as returned by ‘guix pull’ and ‘guix time-machine’ depends on
>> GnuTLS. So here, we have a special case: to build Guix itself, you need
>> to build GnuTLS first, and there’s no way to pass ‘--without-tests’
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 14:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Guix as returned by ‘guix pull’ and ‘guix time-machine’ depends on
> GnuTLS. So here, we have a special case: to build Guix itself, you need
> to build GnuTLS first, and there’s no way to pass ‘--without-tests’ at
> that level.
>
> I’m
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 06:24:57PM -0500, Carl Dong wrote:
>> One of the main reasons for switching over to Guix is for its
>> bootstrappbility and the ability to perform `--bootstrap --no-substitutes`
>> builds. As mentioned in the gnutls ticket, performing these
Hi,
Carl Dong skribis:
> One of the main reasons for switching over to Guix is for its
> bootstrappbility and the ability to perform `--bootstrap --no-substitutes`
> builds. As mentioned in the gnutls ticket, performing these source-based
> builds can sometimes reveal problems with tests
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 06:24:57PM -0500, Carl Dong wrote:
> One of the main reasons for switching over to Guix is for its
> bootstrappbility and the ability to perform `--bootstrap --no-substitutes`
> builds. As mentioned in the gnutls ticket, performing these source-based
> builds can
Hi Guix!
TL;DR Shall we add a `--without-tests` option (or something similar) for `guix
time-machine`?
Our release workflow in Bitcoin is planned to shift over to Guix for the next
release, and as such we have a lot more testers who are running Guix as we
speak on their machines! Exciting!
