Hi!
This issue became obsolete with the ‘CODE-OF-CONDUCT’ update in
4254d74b4ca6d4aa78b7fa055fc9ec72a2e93ad3; closing!
Ludo’.
Hello,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Maxime Devos skribis:
>> ‘The following’, I think?
>
> It's an example of the pseudo-legalese people can slip into when
> writing An Official Document.
>
> On 2022-02-27 14:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Maybe something more like "Note: In this document,
Maxime Devos skribis:
‘The following’, I think?
It's an example of the pseudo-legalese people can slip into when writing
An Official Document.
On 2022-02-27 14:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Maybe something more like "Note: In this document, ..." ?
If that sounds clearer, let’s do that!
Hello,
Maxime Devos skribis:
> Vagrant Cascadian schreef op zo 20-02-2022 om 12:26 [-0800]:
>> Note: In the sequel, "project" refers to GNU Guix, and "project
>> maintainer(s)" refers to maintainer(s) of GNU Guix.
>>
>> What does "the sequel" refer to?
>
> ‘The following’, I think?
Per
Vagrant Cascadian schreef op zo 20-02-2022 om 12:26 [-0800]:
> Note: In the sequel, "project" refers to GNU Guix, and "project
> maintainer(s)" refers to maintainer(s) of GNU Guix.
>
> What does "the sequel" refer to?
‘The following’, I think?
> Maybe something more like "Note: In this
In the CODE-OF-CONDUCT, I see the phrase:
Note: In the sequel, "project" refers to GNU Guix, and "project
maintainer(s)" refers to maintainer(s) of GNU Guix.
What does "the sequel" refer to?
Maybe something more like "Note: In this document, ..." ?
Maybe the intended meaning is lost in
