Hi Ludo,
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 at 16:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I don’t know if there is a way to catch such mistakes early. Field
>> sanitizers?
>
> Yes, we should do that. We can arrange to have most checks done at
> compile time, similar to how the ‘synopsis’ and ‘description’ sanitizers
Hi,
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis:
> zimoun writes:
>> The culprit seems the package ’qtserialport’ in ’packages-builder’ from
>> (apps packages builder). Maybe introduced by commit
>> 1ef04fb2288dade3ad2883026ae286a68ef13a1e.
>
> This was a first failing commit for me too, but the
Hi Julien,
Thanks for explaining.
On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 at 19:14, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>
> No warning because the compiler has no way to know you don't want to
> do that. license is a field, and fields don't have a specific type
> except for convention.
Arf, it is where OCaml shines. ;-)
Le 7 septembre 2022 19:07:10 GMT+02:00, zimoun a
écrit :
>Hi,
>
>Well, the field reads,
>
>+(license (package-home-page qtbase
>
>so why is the compiler accepting that? Is a warning raised?
>
No warning because the compiler has no way to know you don't want to do that.
license is a
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 at 18:31, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
> zimoun writes:
>> The culprit seems the package ’qtserialport’ in ’packages-builder’ from
>> (apps packages builder). Maybe introduced by commit
>> 1ef04fb2288dade3ad2883026ae286a68ef13a1e.
>
> This was a first failing
zimoun writes:
> The culprit seems the package ’qtserialport’ in ’packages-builder’ from
> (apps packages builder). Maybe introduced by commit
> 1ef04fb2288dade3ad2883026ae286a68ef13a1e.
This was a first failing commit for me too, but the reason the website
does not build appears to be the
Hi,
On dim., 04 sept. 2022 at 17:18, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> srfi/srfi-1.scm:241:2: In procedure map:
> In procedure map: Wrong type argument: "https://www.qt.io/;
> building pages in '/tmp/gnu.org/software/guix'...
> Backtrace:
>2 (primitive-load
Quoting my own email I think this is the relevant bit. I don't think it's an
issue in haunt, but something with qt:
srfi/srfi-1.scm:241:2: In procedure map:
In procedure map: Wrong type argument: "https://www.qt.io/;
building pages in '/tmp/gnu.org/software/guix'...
Le 5 septembre 2022 14:04:10
Hi,
On lun., 05 sept. 2022 at 12:59, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
> zimoun writes:
>> $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL=yes guix environment -C -m
>> manifest.scm \
>> -E LANG -E GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL --share=/tmp
>> \
>>
On lun., 05 sept. 2022 at 12:27, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I used guix build -f .guix.scm. I'm on the latest guix-artwork but an
> older guix from maybe a month ago. GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL doesn't build
> everything, only a subset of packages end up in the generated list. I
> think my issue is with
zimoun writes:
> $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL=yes guix environment -C -m
> manifest.scm \
> -E LANG -E GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL --share=/tmp
> \
> -- haunt build
Yes but `guix build -f .guix.scm` fails for me too, perhaps
I used guix build -f .guix.scm. I'm on the latest guix-artwork but an older
guix from maybe a month ago. GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL doesn't build everything, only
a subset of packages end up in the generated list. I think my issue is with qt,
which probably isn't part of that subset.
Le 5 septembre
Hi Julien
On dim., 04 sept. 2022 at 17:18, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I tried to update the po files for the website today, but I was unable
> to test. Trying to build the website from a clean checkout (without
> updating translations) gives this error. I think it's related to the
> code that
Hi Guix!
I tried to update the po files for the website today, but I was unable
to test. Trying to build the website from a clean checkout (without
updating translations) gives this error. I think it's related to the
code that generate the list of packages:
Backtrace:
In ice-9/eval.scm:
14 matches
Mail list logo
