Hi,
Antero Mejr writes:
> This allows extension of QT_PLUGIN_PATH.
> QT programs will now work under Wayland when qt-wayland is installed.
>
> * guix/build/qt-utils.scm (variables-for-wrapping)[QT_PLUGIN_PATH]: Add prefix
> value to 'wrap-program' procedure call for QT_PLUGIN_PATH variable.
>
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hello,
>
> Marek Paśnikowski writes:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I found a piece of QT documentation on handling of plugins [1].
>>
>> Is it helpful to achieving working Plasma Desktop on Guix?
>>
>> Maxim - I was able to only find your email address; I don't think the
Hello,
Marek Paśnikowski writes:
> Hello.
>
> I found a piece of QT documentation on handling of plugins [1].
>
> Is it helpful to achieving working Plasma Desktop on Guix?
>
> Maxim - I was able to only find your email address; I don't think the
> other participants of this Debbugs issue will
Hi,
Marek Paśnikowski writes:
> Hello.
>
> I found a piece of QT documentation on handling of plugins [1].
>
> Is it helpful to achieving working Plasma Desktop on Guix?
>
> Maxim - I was able to only find your email address; I don't think the
> other participants of this Debbugs issue will
Hello.
I found a piece of QT documentation on handling of plugins [1].
Is it helpful to achieving working Plasma Desktop on Guix?
Maxim - I was able to only find your email address; I don't think the other
participants of this Debbugs issue will receive a copy of this message.
Best Regards,
Would it be possible to patch the wrapper before the Guix 1.4.0 release,
or at least document somewhere that qt wayland is blocked by this bug?
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> [re-sending again, this time with debbugs in CC]
>
> Hello,
>
> Morgan Smith writes:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Ever since commit 1f466ed6be932526fc69e72ffd50390691d0d382 we don't look
>> at the user's value of QT_PLUGIN_PATH. The comment says this is to
>> prevent plugin
[re-sending again, this time with debbugs in CC]
Hello,
Morgan Smith writes:
> Hello!
>
> Ever since commit 1f466ed6be932526fc69e72ffd50390691d0d382 we don't look
> at the user's value of QT_PLUGIN_PATH. The comment says this is to
> prevent plugin confusion between Qt5 and Qt6 stuff.
Yes;
Hello!
Ever since commit 1f466ed6be932526fc69e72ffd50390691d0d382 we don't look
at the user's value of QT_PLUGIN_PATH. The comment says this is to
prevent plugin confusion between Qt5 and Qt6 stuff.
This is very unfortunate for me. I have qtwayland (qt5) installed in my
profile so QT programs
