bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-05-02 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Am Sonntag, dem 30.04.2023 um 21:07 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> > In the current mpd-configuration, to use my own user, I must also >> > provide the matching group as a record, even if >> > e.g. 'users' is something I've never

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-05-01 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi Maxim, Am Sonntag, dem 30.04.2023 um 21:07 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > In the current mpd-configuration, to use my own user, I must also > > provide the matching group as a record, even if > > e.g. 'users' is something I've never created myself and don't > > really > > have a clue as

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-30 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Samstag, dem 29.04.2023 um 13:16 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> This means we do not have to expose user-accounts at the >> , which is not the right place for that anyway; >> it's already exposed via the users/groups fields of the > system>

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Samstag, dem 29.04.2023 um 13:16 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > This means we do not have to expose user-accounts at the > , which is not the right place for that anyway; > it's already exposed via the users/groups fields of the system> record. > > That's much easier to reason with, for

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Samstag, dem 29.04.2023 um 08:26 +0200 schrieb Liliana Marie > Prikler: >> IIRC using supplementary groups does not suffice, because the >> service won't work then; do I actually recall that correctly?  > Reading the rest of the series it turns

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Bruno, Bruno Victal writes: [...] -The default @code{%mympd-group} is a system group with name ``mympd''. @item @code{work-directory} (default: @code{"/var/lib/mympd"}) (type: string) Where myMPD will store its data. @@ -33872,7 +33869,7 @@ Audio Services

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Samstag, dem 29.04.2023 um 08:26 +0200 schrieb Liliana Marie > Prikler: >> IIRC using supplementary groups does not suffice, because the >> service won't work then; do I actually recall that correctly?  > Reading the rest of the series it turns

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Bruno Victal
On 2023-04-29 02:15, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > Bruno Victal writes: > > [...] > >>> @item @code{shepherd-requirement} (default: @code{()}) (type: >>> list-of-symbol) >>> This is a list of symbols naming Shepherd services that this service >>> @@ -33824,15 +33824,12 @@ Audio Services

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Samstag, dem 29.04.2023 um 08:26 +0200 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler: > IIRC using supplementary groups does not suffice, because the > service won't work then; do I actually recall that correctly?  Reading the rest of the series it turns out that worry was unwarranted. Supplementary groups do

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-29 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Freitag, dem 28.04.2023 um 10:26 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > Prior to this change, there was a discrepancy where a user could have > disagreeing groups between the group and user fields (the user field > being a record, which includes its primary group as a > string).  This could have

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-28 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Bruno Victal writes: [...] >> @item @code{shepherd-requirement} (default: @code{()}) (type: >> list-of-symbol) >> This is a list of symbols naming Shepherd services that this service >> @@ -33824,15 +33824,12 @@ Audio Services >> This is a list of symbols naming Shepherd services that

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-28 Thread Bruno Victal
On 2023-04-28 15:26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Prior to this change, there was a discrepancy where a user could have > disagreeing groups between the group and user fields (the user field being a > record, which includes its primary group as a string). This > could have caused problems because

bug#63082: [PATCH 04/17] services: mpd: Obsolete the 'group' field.

2023-04-28 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Prior to this change, there was a discrepancy where a user could have disagreeing groups between the group and user fields (the user field being a record, which includes its primary group as a string). This could have caused problems because the USER's group was being used to set the file