This is being worked on at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68716
Am Dienstag, dem 09.01.2024 um 12:10 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Dear Guix,
>
> [...]
I know that a bunch of packages have reasons not to exist in Guix, I
simply wanted to point out that we don't have them.
> > I think we should settle on what to do with the gnome package soon
> > to not stall
Dear Guix,
Le dimanche 07 janvier 2024 à 17:53 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a
écrit :
> I've summarised our TODOs below: Each commented line (preceded by #)
> denotes a package that doesn't exist on the gnome-team branch yet.
>
> core:atkmm:2.28.3:
Oops, I missed that one. Sorry. I checked the li
Am Dienstag, dem 05.12.2023 um 21:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Dear guix,
>
> On the one hand, we have this list of packages:
> https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/44.6/versions
For the record, we have a new 44 release:
https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/44.7/ver
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:55:56PM +0100, Vivien Kraus via Bug reports for GNU
Guix wrote:
> Dear guix,
>
> The gnome package disables eog on 32-bit machines because it depends on
> librsvg-next. It seems a bit outdated to me, as most of gnome won’t
> work on 32-bit machines, not only eog. Should
Hi Vivien,
Am Dienstag, dem 05.12.2023 um 21:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Dear guix,
>
> On the one hand, we have this list of packages:
> https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/44.6/versions
>
> On the other hand, we have the propagated-inputs of the gnome
> package.
>
> Should
Dear guix,
On the one hand, we have this list of packages:
https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/44.6/versions
On the other hand, we have the propagated-inputs of the gnome package.
Should we update the latter so that it contains everything from the
former? What should we do about t
