º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å,Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó
Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±ÍÇÏÀÇ E-MAILÀº °Ô½ÃÆÇ µî ÀÎÅÍ³Ý »ó¿¡¼ ¾Ë°Ô µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, E-mailÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Á¤º¸µµ ¾ËÁö ¸øÇÔÀ» ¹àÈü´Ï´Ù.
Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¼ºÀα¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á Á˼ÛÇÏ¿À¸ç,Á¤ÁßÈ÷ ¾çÇغÎŹµå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» ´õÀÌ»ó ¹Þ°í ½ÍÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã´Ù¸é
Daniel Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Calling device_write with an invalid data_count, device_write will return
an error (D_INVALID_SIZE). I didn't checked the return value, instead
I tested for the bytes_written and of course there's only a bogus
value.
This is a general rule for MiG
Hi,
I wanted to use a hierarchy of argp parsers in the console server, one in
each driver module, one for focus groups, one for consoles, and one for the
main program. However, argp parents and childs shade the options of other
childs, in the sense that argp calls only one parser for each
I have checked this in. Thanks.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 07:47:23PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
If you wanted to do that, you could call another argp's parse_opt function
from yours via the children pointers.
Ok.
As to your particular option syntax plans for console, I can't even figure
out what most of that means
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:26:52PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
Has anyone tried this code at all?
Ok, I bite. First, it compiles and builds. The statically compiled ext2fs
contains the following store classes (don't mind the date in the path, the
directory has the latest CVS code of today):
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:14:46PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
The io_bitmap_* functions can be static (and get inlined), no?
Yes, done.
You left machine_task_zone.
Uh, removed.
Btw, you could use a zone for the iopb's instead of
kalloc, since they are all the same size. It's not much
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 06:38:33PM -0800, James Morrison wrote:
This will store my apache logs in /home/jim/apache, and
/var/log/apache will just be a reference to this weeks logs. Now if
I can figure out a way to add transparent gunzip to filemux, I will
have found a way to replace all the
Do you think the performance increase is worth the memory overhead of a
zone, esp if you preallocate iopb's (each being 8192 bytes huge)?
What memory overhead are you talking about? The zone_t data structure is
just a few words. The question is basically whether or not you have a free
list
when reading past the end of a storeio provided file, you get EIO because
offset is equal to the size of the underlying store, but the only offset
check is in dev_rw:
EIO is reasonable for a read some distance off the end of the store.
Reading precisely at the end should report EOF (return
10 matches
Mail list logo
