[°ø°³ °í¹ß]±¹Á¤¿ø ½ÅÆÇ! 'Á¦2¼öÁö±è' »ç°Ç!, °£Ã¸³¯Á¶-ÀºÆó ¹üÁËÀ» °í¹ßÇÕ´Ï´Ù!

2002-04-07 Thread ±èÇÊ¿ø
O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù [±¤°í-°ø°³°í¹ßÀå!] ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº Çü¹ý, ±¹°¡º¸¾È¹ý, ¾È±âºÎ¹ý, Æø·ÂÇàÀ§µîó¹ú¿¡°üÇѹý·ü µî°ú, Çü»ç¼Ò¼Û¹ý Á¦223Á¶, Á¦234Á

Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success

2002-04-07 Thread James Morrison
--- Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio? > > > It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we > > are ready to nix the pre-libio packag

(±¤°í) ¹«Àκ¸¾È°æºñ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ¹«·á·Î¼³Ä¡Çص帳´Ï´Ù

2002-04-07 Thread test
 ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä º¸¾È°æºñȸ»ç ĸ½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù   ¹«Àκ¸¾È½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ¹«·á·Î  ¼³Ä¡ÇØ µå¸®°í ÀÖ»ç¿À´Ï  ºÎµð À̹ø±âȸ¿¡ Àú·ÅÇÏ°Ô ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ½Ê½Ã¿ä  ¾ÆÆÄÆ® »ó°¡ ´ë¸®Á¡ »ç¹«½Ç  ÁÖÁ¡ À½½ÄÁ¡  °øÀåµî 365ÀÏ ¾ÈÀüÀ» Ã¥ÀÓÁ®µå¸³´Ï´Ù  ÀüÈ­Áֽøé ÀÚ¼¼È÷  ¾È³» ÇØ µå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù ½ÃÈï½Ã Àü¹®¿µ¾÷µô·¯ ÀÌ°úÀå018-232-2677Àü±¹ ¾îµðµç ¿¬¶

Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio? > It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we > are ready to nix the pre-libio package archive. Do you have any preferance as to when that o

ÁÁÀº M&A / ȸ»ç ¸Å°¢Á¤º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

2002-04-07 Thread test
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä.   Àλý¿¡¼­ÀÇ ±âȸ´Â ÀÚÁÖ ¿ÀÁö ¾ÊÀ» µí ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.   ¼Ò°³ÇÏ´Â M&A ȸ»ç Á¤º¸´Â ´Ù½Ã ¿À±â Èûµç ±âȸÀÓÀ» ºÐ¸íÈ÷ ÀÚ½ÅÇϸç È«º¸¸¦ ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.   ¸ÕÀú ȸ»çÀÇ Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ¼Ò°³¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ¾øÀ½À» ÀÌÇØÇÏ¿© Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.   ÀÌ´Â ÁøÇàÀÌ ºñ¹Ð¸®¿¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áö±â¸¦ Èñ¸ÁÇϴ º»ÀÎÀÇ ÀÇ»ç·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ±×·¯ÇÏ´Ï   ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ »

Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success

2002-04-07 Thread Roland McGrath
> Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio? It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we are ready to nix the pre-libio package archive. > 1) Try builds with Marcus' ioperms patches. This requires oskit-mach > headers (which I have) but I would pref

%gs:0 thread pseudoregister in oskit-mach

2002-04-07 Thread Roland McGrath
I have implemented the %gs:0 pseudo-register in oskit-mach. If you are already using oskit-mach, please update and try out the new code. What you should now see is that in user threads %gs has a different value from %ds. You should be able to read and write one and only one word at %gs:0. This

Re: Thread Local Storage & i386-gnu (Was: Re: [PATCH] Add _dl_init_first to elf/Versions)

2002-04-07 Thread Roland McGrath
I changed the CC to recipients appropriate for Hurd discussion. Yes, I've decided what to do. In fact, I should do it already. It's already specified that the "thread register" is one word at %gs:0. We can implement this now with a per-thread LDT using the existing Mach interfaces, but I thi

Re: GNU Mach on Alpha

2002-04-07 Thread Roland McGrath
> What parts of OSKit is GNU Mach going to use? I'm assuming that it is not > going to use all of it... You should build the oskit and oskit-mach for x86 (even if you're not going to use it) so you can see for yourself. > So far, I've already got oskit/dev, oskit/oskit/alpha, and oskit/threads

Re: OSKit bug in partition checker

2002-04-07 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:29:44AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > > The following (one line) patch fixes the problem and I can boot > > > > the Hurd with oskit-mach and see all my partitions. > > > > Cool. This fixes my boot

Çϸ®¼ö°¡ ³Ø»çÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¸Ô´Â´Ù¸é?[±¤°í]

2002-04-07 Thread ¸®¼ö
Title: Untitled Document º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ¹öÆ°À» Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ󸮰¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áý´Ï´Ù.

TV/Uydu Yayinlarina Artik Sifre Kisitlamasi Yok! -vtmntfwb

2002-04-07 Thread buelvxjv
Sayin Internet Kullanicisi, Turkiye'de yayin yapanlar basta olmak uzere, Dunya'daki tum sifreli TV kanallarini cozen ve basit bir TV kartiyla bu yayinlari bilgisayarinizdan size izleme olanagi saglayan, sifre kirici programlarin kayitli oldugu, DECODER CD (v2.0)" satisa sunulmustur (40 EURO +

Re: gcc3 and compiler warnings

2002-04-07 Thread Neal H Walfield
> Ok, so the parentheses only tell the compiler to increment the pointer and not > the value that the pointer is pointing to. That is what was always happening. I think that you do not understand what a postincrement does: void* post_pointer_inc (void **p) { void *r =

Re: gcc3 and compiler warnings

2002-04-07 Thread James Morrison
--- Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would this not change semantics of the line by moving the pointer p before > > dereferencing it? > > No, it is a post-increment. > Ok, so the parentheses only tell the compiler to increment the pointer and not the value that the pointer is

Re: gcc3 and compiler warnings

2002-04-07 Thread Neal H Walfield
> Would this not change semantics of the line by moving the pointer p before > dereferencing it? No, it is a post-increment. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: OSKit bug in partition checker

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > The following (one line) patch fixes the problem and I can boot > > > the Hurd with oskit-mach and see all my partitions. > > Cool. This fixes my booting problem too. > Is it reported as a Debian bug? I've been emailing w

Re: gcc3 and compiler warnings

2002-04-07 Thread James Morrison
--- Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:34:08PM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > > Hi, > > > > gcc3 produces warnings for code that looks like: > > major = ntohl (*p++); > > where p is a pointer. There is a lot of code that looks like this in > > hu

[±¤°í]3000¸¸°³ÀÇ Áß±¹ÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏ ¸®½ºÆ®

2002-04-07 Thread emaildb
Title: Untitled Document *º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. *e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻó °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. * º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ´Ü ÀÏȸ¸¸ Àü´Þ µË´Ï´Ù.

Re: gcc3 and compiler warnings

2002-04-07 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:34:08PM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > Hi, > > gcc3 produces warnings for code that looks like: > major = ntohl (*p++); > where p is a pointer. There is a lot of code that looks like this in > hurd/nfs. > would the fix look like: > major = ntohl (*p);

Re: OSKit bug in partition checker

2002-04-07 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 12:04:57PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > The following (one line) patch fixes the problem and I can boot the > > Hurd with oskit-mach and see all my partitions. > > Cool. This fixes my booting problem too. Is it reported as a Debian bug? Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egypt

(no subject)

2002-04-07 Thread Á¦ÁÖ ÇѶó¸®Á¶Æ®
Title: ÇѶó¸®Á¶Æ® ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä - Àü±¹ Áö¿ª 12üÀÎ Äܵµ ȸ¿ø°¡ ÀÌ¿ë(ÁÖ¸», ¿¬ÈÞ, ¼º¼ö±â Æ÷ÇÔ) - ½Â¸¶Àå 30%, ¼º»êÆ÷ Á¦ÁÖ Sea-World ÇØÀúÀá¼öÇÔ