Àá½Ã ½¬½Ã¸é¼­ ÀÏÇϼ¼¿ä. ÁÖÀ§¸¦ µÑ·¯º¸½Ã°í...^.^ ¸¶ÄÉÆðü·Ã ³»¿ëÀÔ´Ï´Ù........(È«^*^º¸)

2002-04-13 Thread ¸¶ÄÉÆÃÀÚ·á
Á¢¼Ó IP : 211.198.226.181 ¢»»ç´Â°Ô ´Ù ±×·´µð´Ù¢» ±×·´µð´Ù. »ç¶÷»ç´Â ÀÏÀÌ ´Ù ±×·¸°í ±×·´µð´Ù. ´É·ÂÀÖ´Ù°í Çؼ­ ÇÏ·ç ¿­ ³¢ ¸Ô´Â °Å ¾Æ´Ï°í, ¸¹ÀÌ ¹è¿ü´Ù°íÇؼ­ ³²µé ¾²´Â ¸» °ú Ʋ¸° ¸» ¾²´Â °Íµµ ¾Æ´Ï°í, ±×·¸°Ô ¹ß¹öµÕ°Å¸®¸ç »ì¾ÆºÃÀÚ »ç¶÷ »ç´Â ÀÏ ´Ù °Å±â¼­ °Å±éµð´Ù. ¹é¿ø ¹ö´Â »ç¶÷ÀÌ Ãµ¿ø ¹ö´Â »ç¶÷

[--±¤°í--] ¿ÀÇÂÀ̺¥Æ® Ä®¶óÇÚµåÆù,PDA ¹«·á+2°¡Áö¼±¹°ÁõÁ¤

2002-04-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: ¢È ¢È ¢È ¢È Æ÷Å»Àü¹®»çÀÌÆ® - www.ptinfor.com ¢È ¢È ¢È ¢È

Mp3 indirin ...

2002-04-13 Thread burcu82
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary==_NextPart_000_00B5_14B43C4B.E2827E85

¸¶Áö¸· Âù½º............¹«·áȨÆäÀÌÁöÁ¦ÀÛ+ÇÚµåÆù30%ÀÚµ¿Â÷º¸Çè15%Æò»ý¼­ºñ½º(±¤°í)

2002-04-13 Thread Àå¼±Èñ
Title: Untitled Document ¢º Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÈ Á¡ »ç°úµå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¢º Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸ÁÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø¹ý±ÔÁ¤À» ÁؼöÇÏ¿© ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÓÀ» Ç¥½ÃÇÏ¿´À¾´Ï´Ù. ¢º ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù ÀÌ ±¤°í³»¿ëÀº ´Ü Çѹø¸¸ ¹ß¼ÛµË´Ï´Ù.

¸¶Áö¸· Âù½º............¹«·áȨÆäÀÌÁöÁ¦ÀÛ+ÇÚµåÆù30%ÀÚµ¿Â÷º¸Çè15%Æò»ý¼­ºñ½º(±¤°í)

2002-04-13 Thread Àå¼±Èñ
Title: Untitled Document ¢º Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÈ Á¡ »ç°úµå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¢º Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸ÁÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø¹ý±ÔÁ¤À» ÁؼöÇÏ¿© ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÓÀ» Ç¥½ÃÇÏ¿´À¾´Ï´Ù. ¢º ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù ÀÌ ±¤°í³»¿ëÀº ´Ü Çѹø¸¸ ¹ß¼ÛµË´Ï´Ù.

[±¤°í] ¾Æ±â ȨÆäÀÌÁö¸¦ ¹«·á·Î ¸¸µé¾îµå¸³´Ï´Ù.

2002-04-13 Thread test
Title: Untitled Document ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼­ÇÎÁß¿¡ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç, E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¢Ñ ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.

25¼¼ ÀÌ»ó¸¸ º¸¼¼¿ä....25¼¼ÀÌÇÏ Àý´ë±ÝÁö [ ±¤ °í ]

2002-04-13 Thread .
Title: ¹Ýµå½Ã ¼ºÀθ¸ Ŭ¸¯ÇØÁÖ¼¼¿ä! ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â »çÀý! 25¼¼ ÀÌ»ó ¼ºÀθ¸ ÀÔÀåÇϼ¼¿ä´ëÇÑ ¹Î±¹ ¼ºÀÎÀ̸é ÇѹøÀº °¡ÀÔÇÑ´Ù´Â ÀÌ»çÀÌÆ®.Àå¾ÈÀÇ È­Á¦ È­»ó äÆùæ..±×·¸´Ù°í ³ë°ñÀûÀÎ ÇൿÀº »ï°¡ÇսôÙ.º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å,Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±ÍÇÏÀÇ E-MAILÀº

[±¤°í]¿¬Ã¼,ä³³,Ä«µå,´ëÃâ °ÆÁ¤ÇÏÁö¸¶¼¼¿©^^

2002-04-13 Thread ¸¶½ºÅÍ
ÀúÈñ ȸ»ç´Â ¿Â¶óÀλóÀÇ Ä«µå´ëÃâ Àü¹® ´ëÇà¾÷üÀÔ´Ï´Ù ´ç»ç ȨÆäÀÌÁö°¡ ±ÍÇÏ¿¡°Ô ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸¶ó ÆǴܵǽøé Áï½Ã ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ¹öÆ°À» Ŭ¸¯ÇØ ÁÖ½Ã¸é °¨»çÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù^^ *´ëÃâ ´ë»ó: ¸¸20~55¼¼ÀÇ ½Å¿ë»óÅ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ Àڷμ­ ´ëÇѹα¹ ±¹¹ÎÀÌ¸é ´©±¸³ª~ *´ëÃâ±â°£: ½ÅûÀϷκÎÅÍ 2~3ÀÏ *´ëÃâ ¹æ¹ý: ÀúÈñ ȨÆäÀÌÁöÀÇ

25¼¼ ÀÌ»ó¸¸ º¸¼¼¿ä....25¼¼ÀÌÇÏ Àý´ë±ÝÁö [ ±¤ °í ]

2002-04-13 Thread .
Title: ¹Ýµå½Ã ¼ºÀθ¸ Ŭ¸¯ÇØÁÖ¼¼¿ä! ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â »çÀý! 25¼¼ ÀÌ»ó ¼ºÀθ¸ ÀÔÀåÇϼ¼¿ä´ëÇÑ ¹Î±¹ ¼ºÀÎÀ̸é ÇѹøÀº °¡ÀÔÇÑ´Ù´Â ÀÌ»çÀÌÆ®.Àå¾ÈÀÇ È­Á¦ È­»ó äÆùæ..±×·¸´Ù°í ³ë°ñÀûÀÎ ÇൿÀº »ï°¡ÇսôÙ.º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å,Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±ÍÇÏÀÇ E-MAILÀº

Re: parted store module

2002-04-13 Thread Damien Genet
salut, sorry still the same problem, whatever i do, i can't find a clean way to name the parted module libstore_part.so.0.2 with automake i thougt about different solutions : add an installation rule to link from the real library to the needed name or don't use automake, whereas parted use

Re: parted store module

2002-04-13 Thread Damien Genet
salut, Le ven 12/04/2002 à 21:05, Roland McGrath a écrit : That is not relevant. You can always add your own rules. you mean, supply my own Makefile ? but then i would have to support all the esoteric rules that parted support via automake, ie: dist, dist-check, mostlyclean, distclean

Re: parted store module

2002-04-13 Thread Neal H Walfield
sorry still the same problem, whatever i do, i can't find a clean way to name the parted module libstore_part.so.0.2 with automake Allow me to add a detail or two. Using libstore, it appears that we can only create libraries with the names of the form `libstore_part-0.2.so'. The code in

Re: parted store module

2002-04-13 Thread Neal H Walfield
Le ven 12/04/2002 à 21:05, Roland McGrath a écrit : That is not relevant. You can always add your own rules. you mean, supply my own Makefile ? but then i would have to support all the esoteric rules that parted support via automake, ie: dist, dist-check, mostlyclean, distclean

Re: fatfs locking

2002-04-13 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FAT doesn't have inodes, so fatfs has to lock the node of the directory that contains the node for which diskfs_cached_lookup is called. This is the root misconception. FAT *does* have inodes. What it doesn't have is *disk inodes*. Or rather, it *does* have disk