Hi, Jason,
> I see multiprogramming as bad as any real sense of
> time is lost and all the problems of locking and synchronization arise.
How do you deal with the following scenario:
Consider a file server: it must handle multiple simultaneous
requests; it has shared meta-data needs to be update
Hello,
2008/11/2 Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> --- On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | kvm -boot a -hda hurd-k16.img -fda grub-0.97-i386-pc.ext2fs -m 512
> \--
>
> It was reported here:
> http://paste.lisp.org/display/67296
>
> Had to us
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22861 (project hurd):
ELinks 0.12pre2 includes a workaround in set_handlers():
* Hurd bug 22861: Work around select() falsely reporting exceptions in pipes.
The workaround slows ELinks down a bit, so it may be reverted after this Hurd
bug has been fixed.
Adam Tkac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, you could use condition like
>
> if (!((mode & O_RDWR) || (mode & O_RDONLY)))
> die();
Better do it like this:
if ((mode & O_ACCMODE) == O_WRONLY)
die();
Am Sonntag 02 November 2008 15:42:02 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Does it depend on having an FTP multiplexer setup at "ftp:",
> It does.
OK. I added that requirement in the niches post.
Thanks!
Arne
--
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff
:)
-- Infinite
Matthew Ayres, le Sun 02 Nov 2008 15:05:07 +, a écrit :
> No doubt this shows my naivety, but why has GNU never built its own
> replacement for Mach?
Just the same story: GNU used to be mostly userspace stuff. Then the
Hurd servers brought some "kernel"ness, pushing the limit a bit further.
Bu
> > > > I would like to see the Hurd focusing on multi-core systems.
> > >
> > > Mach would need to be SMP-fixed first :)
> >
> > Does that mean the Hurd can't yet be used on multi-core systems?
>
> Hurd yes (though there are probably bugs), Mach no (as the smp code was
> never maintained in the me
Shakthi Kannan, le Sun 02 Nov 2008 19:53:05 +0530, a écrit :
> --- On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | kvm -boot a -hda hurd-k16.img -fda grub-0.97-i386-pc.ext2fs -m 512
> \--
>
> It was reported here:
> http://paste.lisp.org/display/67296
>
> Had to use
BTW, I thought about smbfs: we'd need a servermux and sharemux there as
well, in order to be able to cd /smb://host/share/dir
Samuel
Arne Babenhauserheide, le Sun 02 Nov 2008 11:05:26 +0100, a écrit :
> Am Dienstag 21 Oktober 2008 09:44:40 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Matthew Ayres, le Mon 20 Oct 2008 17:59:37 +0100, a écrit :
> > > I would like to see the Hurd focusing on multi-core systems.
> >
> > Mach would need to be SMP-fi
Arne Babenhauserheide, le Sun 02 Nov 2008 10:50:09 +0100, a écrit :
> Am Sonntag 02 November 2008 01:23:15 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Arne Babenhauserheide, le Sun 02 Nov 2008 01:03:47 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Am Montag 20 Oktober 2008 15:00:22 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > > > - Nice features: dpkg
Hi,
--- On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| kvm -boot a -hda hurd-k16.img -fda grub-0.97-i386-pc.ext2fs -m 512
\--
It was reported here:
http://paste.lisp.org/display/67296
Had to use it with -no-kvm-irqchip or -no-kvm-pit.
For setting up kvm on debian,
Hi,
I have setup bridging on the host, and running:
qemu -boot a -hda hurd-k16.img -fda grub-0.97-i386-pc.ext2fs
boots Hurd and networking works fine as well. I am using Debian Lenny
with 2.6.26-1-686 kernel. I have installed kvm, kvm-sources and loaded
kvm-intel module as well. When I try to
Hi,
I sorted the niches according to the amount of work necessary to get
into them.
Please comment (even if it's only a short sentence to one of the
niches)!
The interesting part is, that I didn't find any unfeasible idea...
-
http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/community/weblogs/ArneBab/niche
Am Mittwoch 29 Oktober 2008 12:16:58 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > - All-in-one out-of-the-box distro running a webserver for crash-proof
> > operation.
>
> I don't really see any advantages the Hurd would offer for ordinary
> software appliances compared to other systems. The whole point of the
>
Am Mittwoch 29 Oktober 2008 12:16:58 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I fear though that such radical things have little chance in Debian --
> so perhaps we actually need a custom distribution for that :-(
Maybe it will have a chance, when the Debian people see the advantage of it.
And while we're c
Am Mittwoch 29 Oktober 2008 12:16:58 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> About the only really unique feature I'm personally aware of besides of
> the ones already mentioned, is the ability to give a user's processes
> new group permissions in a running session. I never used it so far
> however, and I wou
Am Dienstag 21 Oktober 2008 09:44:40 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Matthew Ayres, le Mon 20 Oct 2008 17:59:37 +0100, a écrit :
> > I would like to see the Hurd focusing on multi-core systems.
>
> Mach would need to be SMP-fixed first :)
Does that mean the Hurd can't yet be used on multi-core systems?
Am Sonntag 02 November 2008 01:23:15 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Arne Babenhauserheide, le Sun 02 Nov 2008 01:03:47 +0100, a écrit :
> > Am Montag 20 Oktober 2008 15:00:22 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > > - Nice features: dpkg -iO ftp://foo/bar/*.deb
> >
> > Could you explain what this does?
>
> It in
19 matches
Mail list logo
