Gentoo GNU/Hurd thread in Gentoo Forums

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Marek Dopiera < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Saturday 08 of November 2008 07:28:17 Sergiu Ivanov napisał(a): > > Please pardon me my question: why won't you contribute to Hurd > > directly now? Especially that you have some experience with it ;-) I'm > > just curiou

Re: [PATCH] Compiler fixes for ipc_mig.c, task.c, memory_object.c, vm_kern.c

Hi, --- On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | +void device_deallocate (device_t dev); | | Err, no, these should rather to go ds_routines.h... \-- There is a conflict for device_deallocate when put in ds_routines.h for linux/pcmcia-cs/glue/ds.c:444 which use

Re: A niche for the Hurd - next step: reality check

Am Freitag 14 November 2008 00:29:27 schrieb Michal Suchanek: > > As far as I know, these are complete (though I doubt that they are proven > > - but how much code really is these days? -> reality check of > > expectations ;) ) > > So that's half of the feasibility requirement ;-) I just realized

[COMMITTED] build system: gcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp

Hello! On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 07:29:37AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > + *-*-gnu*) > > +# Avoid complicated tests (see > > +# ) and for now > > +# simply assert that glibc does provide this, which is true for all > > +# real

Re: A niche for the Hurd - next step: reality check

Am Freitag 14 November 2008 00:29:27 schrieb Michal Suchanek: > If I do not need radical changes but require to change somewhat how > the translator works I have to recreate it in lisp - not modify, > recreate. With no sample code how to write a working replacement for > what I intended to modify.