Hi to all,
i think it is a good purpouse, in matter of the fact less UNIX
is needed to complete the purpousal of creating a desktop operating system
that reach the optimal system for end user usage of it. So good work to all
and if is need some traslation from english to italian i'm her
diff --git a/options.c b/options.c
index c03676d..beed9f4 100644
--- a/options.c
+++ b/options.c
@@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ static const struct argp_option argp_common_options[] =
"Set the priority for the following filesystem to VALUE", 1},
{ OPT_LONG_PATTERN, OPT_PATTERN, "PATTERN", 0,
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index b7e5716..7b7ce01 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
# USA.
# Get the information from under /usr.
-prefix = /usr/
+prefix = /usr
CPP = gcc -E -x c
MIGCOM = mig -cc cat - /dev/null
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ CFLAGS += -Wall -g -O2 -D_FILE_OFFSE
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 3129031..b7e5716 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
-# Hurd unionfs
-# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-# Written by Jeroen Dekkers .
+# Hurd unionmount
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2009 Free
diff --git a/main.c b/main.c
index c33b065..e407926 100644
--- a/main.c
+++ b/main.c
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
/* Argument parsing. */
argp_parse (&argp_startup, argc, argv, ARGP_IN_ORDER, 0, 0);
+ /* Register the underlying node in the ulfs list. */
+ ulfs_register
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index b180072..3129031 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307
# USA.
+# Get the information from under /usr.
+prefix = /usr/
+
CPP = gcc -E -x c
MIGCOM = mig -cc cat - /dev/nu
Hello,
I am working on unionmount project, which is (at the moment) a branch
in unionfs git repository
(http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/unionfs.git/). The goal of
unionmount is to mount a translator is such a way that the underlying
filesystem gets merged with the (virtual) filesystem publis
Hi Neal,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:35:00PM +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Mon, 18 May 2009 07:44:54 +0200, > wrote:
> This looks like a fine addition. One could imagine more complex
> schemes, which enable remapping (think scatter/gather type
> mechanisms), however, I don't think that thi
Hi,
For a while I have been thinking about the lack of a roadmap for the
Hurd; but now I realized that we lack something even more fundamental: a
simple mission statement -- i.e. saying *where* we want to go, rather
than how we want to get there. I think many of the problems we have are
directly o