Hi Michael,
On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 00:23:50 Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
This is the Roadmap I dreamt of:
Sorry, but this is a wishlist, not a roadmap.
Or a dream :)
The difference from a pure wishlist is that there's an
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote:
I just dreamed of a Roadmap the Hurd might have - a Roadmap which would be the
perfect Roadmap for making the Hurd useful for me.
Could you please dream *how* to solve the major drawbacks in Hurd and
to make
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:18:55PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:44:59PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
wrote:
I was going to refute your suggestion of ioctl handlers, but in
arguing about it back and forth with myself, I ended up agreeing with
you. ;-)
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:27:33PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
This is not really that important here (and the same applies to my other
nit-picking by the way -- but you chose to be with those picky Hurd
people, didn't you?), but as a guideline for forthcoming situations, and
to make
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:31:45PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
I'm posting a series of patches which bring unionfs to an intermediate
stage on its road towards unionmount:
A generic remark here: Try to post a patch series as a single thread.
git format-patch has some features that are
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09:04AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
+/*---*/
+#include unionmount.h
+/*---*/
+
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:08:51AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
On Wednesday, 27. May 2009 16:45:52 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
I hope the niches discussion was useful nontheless.
Definitely! It helped me a lot in getting a clearer picture of these
things.
The only part I am not
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:00:30AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
From 6f3e628fa4e90ed1316b2919b2d1a7ea08986b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergiu Ivanov unlimitedscol...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:19:23 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Update Makefile to make unionfs build.
I wonder, is
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:08:06AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
-case OPT_ADD:/* --add */
- ulfs_mode = ULFS_MODE_ADD;
- break;
-
-case OPT_REMOVE: /* --remove */
- ulfs_mode = ULFS_MODE_REMOVE;
- break;
-
You removed the options to
hi,
The mission of the Hurd project is: to create a general-purpose
kernel ..
i guess there's something missing in it_
i would say: a modern general-purpose multiserver microkernel os..
the 'modern' part of it means the will to create the sound system, usb
/ wifi stacks,
128Gb disk I/O
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:18:02AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
I could have never supposed that a diff could possibly contain such
lines... I just didn't look over my patch at all initially...
Please *always* look through your patches.
It's a good policy to look through the diffs before
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:37:19PM +0200, Alessandro Mosca wrote:
The mission of the Hurd project is: to create a general-purpose
kernel ..
i guess there's something missing in it_
i would say: a modern general-purpose multiserver microkernel os..
I intentionally left the
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
In the end, how much code will be shared between unionfs and
unionmount? Would it perhaps make sense -- in the long term, need not
be right now -- to transfer the guts of unionfs into a library that
can then be shared
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:03:16AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
@@ -90,6 +96,8 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
if (err)
error (EXIT_FAILURE, err, failed to initialize root node);
+ ulfs_check ();
+
/* Map the time, used for updating node information. */
err =
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09:04AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
OBJS = main.o node.o lnode.o ulfs.o ncache.o netfs.o \
- lib.o options.o pattern.o stow.o update.o
+ lib.o options.o pattern.o stow.o update.o unionmount.o
unionmount is not a good name for a file, when the whole
15 matches
Mail list logo
