At Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:52:42 -0700 (PDT),
Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > Do you mean that there is some code relying on these Hurd semantics, and
> > that therefore we should not try to change them to match POSIX, except
> > maybe when the pthread functions are used?
>
> I mean the semantics are the
Hello,
It's strange. I thought the problem doesn't exist any more after I made some
changes in the kernel. Are you using the latest gnumach in the
master-user_level_drivers branch?
Best,
Zheng Da
On 8/30/10 12:15 AM, Diego Nieto Cid wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Short story: something is clearing kernel_
Hello,
Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit :
> The original WAIT_DEBUG code in libthreads records the
> thread which is holding the lock, but this is not really usefull in
> Hurd's translators, since that thread is probably waiting for another
> message just as everyone else,
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 02 Sep 2010 01:00:14 +0200, a écrit :
> Jeremie Koenig, le Wed 01 Sep 2010 13:04:33 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:06:32AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > { "anonymous-owner", 'a', "USER", 0,
> > > > "Make USER the owner of files related to
Hello,
Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 08 Nov 2009 10:36:16 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:56:30AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:16:15AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > > wrote:
Roland McGrath, le Thu 02 Sep 2010 19:52:42 -0700, a écrit :
> > Do you mean that there is some code relying on these Hurd semantics, and
> > that therefore we should not try to change them to match POSIX, except
> > maybe when the pthread functions are used?
>
> I mean the semantics are the seman
Hello,
2010/9/3 Da Zheng :
>
> It's strange. I thought the problem doesn't exist any more after I made some
> changes in the kernel.
>
It is, indeed. It did work once. But since I lost the binaries, I
couldn't properly build it again.
Theese are the last lines of code I can reach while stepping
Hi, sorry I did not answer that one earlier.
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:16:50PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
(...)
> > Ah, so it's really not like "nobody", that's for tasks whose owner is
> > yet unknown, but potentially root-owned or such, or something like this?
These tasks (for instance the
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:04:08PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Right, I believe it should be feasible to keep the signal sematic of
> libthreads and give the posix semantic to libpthread.
Yes, we should make libc manage a set of "process signal receiving"
threads, which would include the initi
