> Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
> ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
That seems appropriate to me. I don't really care about the names. It's
certainly the case that there never should have been, and never should be,
any material distinction between GNU/L
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:04:38 -0700, a écrit :
> > Well, it frightens me a bit to add something called "LINUX" in all GNU
> > systems: what if somebody adds something there that we don't want to add
> > to some GNU system? What if we want to add something for GNU/Hurd that
> > Linux p
> Well, it frightens me a bit to add something called "LINUX" in all GNU
> systems: what if somebody adds something there that we don't want to add
> to some GNU system? What if we want to add something for GNU/Hurd that
> Linux people do not want to add?
The ABI is the value, not the name.
> I k
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 10:48:12 -0700, a écrit :
> > Ground issue is this:
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10549
> > gcc/glibc now uses GNU-specific extensions to the ELF format (GNU_IFUNC,
> > GNU_UNIQUE). For such cases, binutils now emits binaries with the
> > GNU/
Arne Babenhauserheide, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 13:45:26 +0200, a écrit :
> An important question I have is what the plan for Debian is exactly: How many
> packages must be ported (XX%) and when do we have to be ready (-MM)?
There's no plan. Ideally we should be able to achieve the same as
kfreebsd
Hi,
Could you have a look at the items for the next MotH - and what I missed?
It is now written directly in the wiki, so that it is much easier to
contribute.
→ http://www.bddebian.com:/~hurd-
web/contributing/web_pages/news/moth_next/
An important question I have is what the plan for Debia
