Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 20:54:43 -0400, a écrit : > On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 02:08:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Indeed. flubber however does respond. Maybe you should request for an > >account there to be able to push changes via git. > > I do have an account on flubber already. Sh

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 02:08:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Indeed. flubber however does respond. Maybe you should request for an account there to be able to push changes via git. I do have an account on flubber already. Should I clone the repo in my flubber home directory, edit there and then p

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 20:02:11 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT), Roland McGrath wrote: > >>I guess Fedora does not leave its 32bit libc.a in /usr/lib, and thus > >>with -nostdlib it won't find it there. You need to pass LDFLAGS which > >>lead to it. > > >

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT), Roland McGrath wrote: I guess Fedora does not leave its 32bit libc.a in /usr/lib, and thus with -nostdlib it won't find it there. You need to pass LDFLAGS which lead to it. It is, but it's in a separate package called glibc-static that you don't get

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

> I guess Fedora does not leave its 32bit libc.a in /usr/lib, and thus > with -nostdlib it won't find it there. You need to pass LDFLAGS which > lead to it. It is, but it's in a separate package called glibc-static that you don't get just by installing glibc-devel.

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 19:17:39 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:26:16 -0400, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: > >configfrag.ac ends like this: > > > ># `${file}' and `$file' have different meanings here with respect to > >having the > ># files in the referenced directory consider

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:26:16 -0400, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: configfrag.ac ends like this: # `${file}' and `$file' have different meanings here with respect to having the # files in the referenced directory considered for `make dist' or not. See #

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:15:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Well, the Debian package does it too, but gets config.status: linking ../i386/i386 to machine It's odd that you get this output while the code is AC_CONFIG_LINKS([machine:$systype/$systype mach/machine:$systype/include

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 18:07:13 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:56:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >It should have been done at the end of ./configure (see the > >configfrag.ac file): I'm getting > > > >config.status: linking i386/i386 to machine > >config.status: linkin

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:56:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: It should have been done at the end of ./configure (see the configfrag.ac file): I'm getting config.status: linking i386/i386 to machine config.status: linking i386/include/mach/i386 to mach/machine Here's what I'm getting: config.stat

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 17:45:52 -0400, a écrit : > gawk -f ../gnumach/gensym.awk ../gnumach/i386/i386/i386asm.sym > > i386/i386/i386asm.symc > gcc -m32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../gnumach -nostdinc -imacros config.h > -Ii386 -I. -I../gnumach/i386 -I../gnumach/i386/include/mach/sa > -I

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:56:35 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Are you building on some x86_64 linux? Yes, 64bit Fedora. In that case it's deemed to fail since linux will try to build gnumach is 64bit mode. You need to cross-compile: I did configure using the --host=i386 flag, but I'll do it yo

Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 10:52:14 -0400, a écrit : > I've installed the gnumach headers and mig, but I cannot get "make > gnumach.gz" to work. I get the following error: Are you building on some x86_64 linux? In that case it's deemed to fail since linux will try to build gnumach is

trying to build gnumach.gz

Hello, I'm trying to build gnumach.gz from git, but I'm having some issues. I'm trying the instructions from: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/gnumach/building.html , but i'm using git, not cvs, as it appears to be more up to date and the repos listed at http://www.gnu.org/s

IRC meeting 2011-08-03

Hi, Reminder: we meet as usual on Wednesday 19:00 UTC on irc.freenode.net, channel #hurd, to discuss all kinds of Hurd-related stuff. Hope to see you all there :-) -antrik-