Hello,
I'm currently working with an update of hurdselect.c in eglibc, and
found a problem with non-blocking delays of value zero. This problem has
been seen before for vi for select and a workaround hack is currently in
the Debian version of eglibc-2.13. I have also seen this problem with my
new
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 Nov 2012 17:32:53 +0100, a écrit :
--- ../hurdselect_orig.c 2012-10-21 22:55:26.0 +0200
+++ ../hurdselect_orig_timeout.c 2012-11-01 12:58:00.0 +0100
@@ -84,9 +84,13 @@
to = (timeout-tv_sec * 1000 +
(timeout-tv_nsec +
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 17:44 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 Nov 2012 17:32:53 +0100, a écrit :
--- ../hurdselect_orig.c2012-10-21 22:55:26.0 +0200
+++ ../hurdselect_orig_timeout.c2012-11-01 12:58:00.0 +0100
@@ -84,9 +84,13 @@
to =
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 Nov 2012 18:04:35 +0100, a écrit :
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 17:44 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 Nov 2012 17:32:53 +0100, a écrit :
--- ../hurdselect_orig.c 2012-10-21 22:55:26.0 +0200
+++ ../hurdselect_orig_timeout.c 2012-11-01
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 18:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 Nov 2012 18:04:35 +0100, a écrit :
I have added 1, just like you tried to in your patch.
to = (timeout-tv_sec * 1000
so it's ms.
OK, 1ms seems to be a little long. If the time-resolution had been
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:20:50PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
OK, 1ms seems to be a little long. If the time-resolution had been 1us
it could have simplified the problem a lot.
This is what my select_timeout branches in some hurd repositories is all
about BTW. But with the recent work on
Hello,
I'm working on a modified hurdselect.c, the poll() part, to enable file
descriptors being bogus, as allowed by POSIX. That case is now solved,
and the revent reported is POLLNVAL. What remains to do to is to return
the POLHUP event (and POLLERR).
Using modified code from gnulib,
The construct used in hurdselect is the mach_msg() function:
__mach_msg (msg.head, MACH_RCV_MSG | options, 0, sizeof msg, portset,
to, MACH_PORT_NULL)
This function call only has parameters set for reading. Can a
subsequent call using MACH_SEND_MSG parameters and messages be used to
find
