Pino Toscano, le Sun 30 Sep 2012 23:53:46 +0200, a écrit :
> The following two patches allow to
> a) make use of the "pthread" glibc sysdep, which provides implementation
>for some functions using pthreads (e.g. aio stuff)
> b) hook the libpthread version inside glibc, so it is properly returne
Hello,
Cyril Roelandt, le Sun 30 Sep 2012 23:23:10 +0200, a écrit :
> I wanted to try httpfs, but the code from the CVS repository failed to
> compile on my Debian GNU/Hurd box. So, here are a few patches.
Thanks!
It seems to be working, indeed.
An unfortunate thing is that it does not seem to
Richard Braun, le Wed 23 Jan 2013 00:32:47 +0100, a écrit :
> The fmh function could in some cases mistakenly call vm_map with a null
> size. A recent kernel fix made that invalid and return KERN_INVALID_ARGUMENT,
> which isn't an expected code here, resulting in the linker not starting.
> Avoid ca
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 12:10 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 17:52 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 00:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 22 Jan 2013 20:53:06 +0100, a écrit :
Now the restructuring is complete (and without excess
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:15:06PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Actually, from my reading the poll documentation (unlike the select one)
> does not say what to do when nfds=0; on Linux, the timeout seems ignored
> and 0 is returned right away, with no delay.
On my system (Debian squeeze), poll a
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:10:05PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Introduced another helper function: _io_select_request()
> The patch does the following:
> 1) Create another helper function: _io_select_request() (good enough name?)
> 2) Sets got to -1 in case of errors and always return got in bot
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> diff --git a/pthread/pt-cancel.c b/pthread/pt-cancel.c
> index d19c557..3698cce 100644
> --- a/pthread/pt-cancel.c
> +++ b/pthread/pt-cancel.c
> @@ -31,9 +31,31 @@ pthread_cancel (pthread_t t)
>if (! p)
> return ESRCH;
>
>
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 17:52 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 00:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 22 Jan 2013 20:53:06 +0100, a écrit :
> Since there was a lot of concerns about code duplication I introduced a
> helper function _wait_for_replies(), spl
