Re: protected payloads for GNU Mach

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:49:23PM -0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Apart from that and perhaps a function to clear the protected payload > value (which may however not be really useful), the whole thing seems > interesting and good to me, do other people agree? Well, since I've pushed that as a pr

Re: protected payloads for GNU Mach

Quoting Richard Braun (2014-02-19 10:47:03) > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:49:23PM -0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Apart from that and perhaps a function to clear the protected payload > > value (which may however not be really useful), the whole thing seems > > interesting and good to me, do other

[IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

Hi hackers. At the moment we received 0 ideas to put in our GSOC ideas page [1]. Google just notified us that GNU will be rejected from this year's GSOC if we dont put ideas in the next 12 hours. No project is interested in participating in GSoC this year?? [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-p

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

Jose E. Marchesi, le Wed 19 Feb 2014 17:57:14 +0100, a écrit : > At the moment we received 0 ideas to put in our GSOC ideas page [1]. > Google just notified us that GNU will be rejected from this year's GSOC > if we dont put ideas in the next 12 hours. > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-proje

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

Hi! On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:05:56 -0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jose E. Marchesi, le Wed 19 Feb 2014 17:57:14 +0100, a écrit : > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas-2014.html > We are. I personnally haven't seen a request for pushing GSOC ideas. We > always have a lot of idea

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

Jose E. Marchesi, le Wed 19 Feb 2014 18:26:18 +0100, a écrit : > In the last years, > , etc., > we'd just place a pointer to our project_ideas page onto the GNU ideas > page, so I suggest to do that again. Separating ou

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

Hi! On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:26:18 +0100, "Jose E. Marchesi" wrote: > In the last years, > , etc., > we'd just place a pointer to our project_ideas page onto the GNU ideas > page, so I suggest to do that again. Separati

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

In the last years, , etc., we'd just place a pointer to our project_ideas page onto the GNU ideas page, so I suggest to do that again. Separating out just a few project ideas does not make too much sense to me -- w

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

> In the last years, > , etc., > we'd just place a pointer to our project_ideas page onto the GNU ideas > page, so I suggest to do that again. Separating out just a few project > ideas does not

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:26:18 +0100, "Jose E. Marchesi" wrote: > In the last years, > , etc., > we'd just place a pointer to our project_ideas page onto the GNU ideas > page, so I suggest to do that

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

jema...@gnu.org (Jose E. Marchesi) writes: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:26:18 +0100, "Jose E. Marchesi" > wrote: > > In the last years, > > , > etc., > > we'd just place a pointer to our project_ideas page on

[PATCH] libstore: fixed some pointer-sign related warnings

libstore/do-bunzip2.c: fixed type modifier, avoiding cast --- libstore/do-bunzip2.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstore/do-bunzip2.c b/libstore/do-bunzip2.c index d599503..d2bc9da 100644 --- a/libstore/do-bunzip2.c +++ b/libstore/do-bunzip2.c @@ -31,8 +

Re: [PATCH] libstore: fixed some pointer-sign related warnings

Ignazio Sgalmuzzo, le Wed 19 Feb 2014 20:07:40 +, a écrit : > libstore/do-bunzip2.c: fixed type modifier, avoiding cast Better, applied :) > --- > libstore/do-bunzip2.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libstore/do-bunzip2.c b/libstore/do-bunzip2.c

Re: [IMPORTANT] GSOC 2014 ideas

> At the moment we received 0 ideas to put in our GSOC ideas page [1]. > Google just notified us that GNU will be rejected from this year's GSOC > if we dont put ideas in the next 12 hours. > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas-2014.html > > No projec