Re: [PATCH] limited support for non-root mlock()

2015-07-09 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-07-08 18:22:56) Justus Winter, le Wed 08 Jul 2015 16:22:28 +0200, a écrit : Alternatively, you could re-purpose the existing RPC `vm_wire', changing the type of its first argument from `host_priv_t' to `host_t' (this is backwards compatible as the privileged

Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic in glibc

2015-07-09 Thread Roland McGrath
Frankly I think it would be better to keep these single-caller interfaces out of libc proper. It's not really ideal that they are there for Linux either, but syscall stubs are less of an issue than real code.

Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic in glibc

2015-07-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Roland McGrath rol...@hack.frob.com skribis: Frankly I think it would be better to keep these single-caller interfaces out of libc proper. It's not really ideal that they are there for Linux either, but syscall stubs are less of an issue than real code. While not ideal, I think it would