Re: Time for another round of releases

Richard Braun, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 16:45:46 +0200, wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:22:32PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > >> Is it possible to make a release of Hurd until mlockall/munlockall is > > >> implemented? From what I understand these functions are needed to build > > >> Hurd on >

Re: Time for another round of releases

Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote: > FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for GNU/Linux (we’re currently > in the process of switching from 2.23 to 2.24), Ah! I was asking the question some time ago, and thought Guix was still on 2.22. We can easily upgrade to 2.23

Re: Time for another round of releases

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:22:32PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Is it possible to make a release of Hurd until mlockall/munlockall is > >> implemented? From what I understand these functions are needed to build > >> Hurd on > >> top of glibc2.24. > > > > Yes, but our current glibc tree is

Re: Time for another round of releases

Hi, Samuel Thibault skribis: > Svante Signell, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 12:27:12 +0200, wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:54 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: >> > it is October, therefore, it is time for a new set of releases :) >> > >> > I'll be going over the changes and

Re: Time for another round of releases

Svante Signell, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 12:27:12 +0200, wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:54 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > > it is October, therefore, it is time for a new set of releases :) > > > > I'll be going over the changes and update the NEWS files as usual, but > > feel free to beat me to

Re: Time for another round of releases

On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:54 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > Hello, > > it is October, therefore, it is time for a new set of releases :) > > I'll be going over the changes and update the NEWS files as usual, but > feel free to beat me to that.  Also, if anyone has some pet patches or > fixes that