On 04/03/2018 11:58 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Joseph Myers, on mar. 03 avril 2018 21:48:32 +, wrote:
The build for i686-gnu also fails using GCC 6 branch with
build-many-glibcs.py:
hurdsig.c: In function 'interrupted_reply_port_location.isra.1':
hurdsig.c:250:39: error: 'portloc' may be us
Hey Brent
I would be willing to help with that project. I'll see what I can do to
contribute.
You said that you had some code written. Where can I find it? Is it in a
branch on the main tree?
Also, would you recommend developing in a GNU/Hurd environment as opposed
to a GNU/Linux environment? I
Hello,
Charlie Sale, le jeu. 05 avril 2018 15:20:10 +, a ecrit:
> I tried running Debian GNU/Hurd in qemu, but I had some major troubles
> with that (keyboard didn't work at all).
That's very surprising since that's what people would usually use. How
did you start it exactly? Which version o
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Charlie Sale
wrote:
> Hey Brent
>
> I would be willing to help with that project. I'll see what I can do to
> contribute.
>
> You said that you had some code written. Where can I find it? Is it in a
> branch on the main tree?
>
No, unfortunately. Part of the rea
Brent W. Baccala, le jeu. 05 avril 2018 18:42:24 -0400, a ecrit:
> Also, I should mention that a major issue on the mailing list for the last two
> months has been upstreaming glibc.
You are FUD-ing a lot here.
> It's again related to how we interact with Debian.
Nope, not at all.
> There are s
Samuel Thibault, le ven. 06 avril 2018 00:53:39 +0200, a ecrit:
> What did happen is that upstream glibc said they'd really want to have
> glibc master actually build on the Hurd (and even cross-build, which is
> not the harder part) so that they can do build tests while revamping the
> code. That
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Brent W. Baccala, le jeu. 05 avril 2018 18:42:24 -0400, a ecrit:
>
> > that the Debian maintainers have threatened to drop us completely unless
> we get
> > our code upstreamed into the main glibc code base.
>
> Nope. That never happened, y
Brent W. Baccala, le jeu. 05 avril 2018 19:06:23 -0400, a ecrit:
> It sure seems that copyright exceptions are made for big pieces of code (Mach,
> LWIP), but not for contributions from individual developers.
You're again FUD-ing here.
There is a huge difference between easy-to-replace contributi
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Brent W. Baccala, le jeu. 05 avril 2018 19:06:23 -0400, a ecrit:
>
> Yes, Mach is
> sort of an exception, because it was merely the ground for the whole
> kernel. But being BSD-licenced, it was not posing problems for future
> re-licensing
I don’t really think this is relevant to the topic at hand (Charlie’s personal
introduction), so perhaps a new thread would be best..
What problem do you have with assigning your copyright to the FSF?
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity Software
On Thursday, April 5, 2018 8:17:59 PM EDT Brent W.
10 matches
Mail list logo