Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Richard Braun
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 01:28:42AM +0200, Richard Braun wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:10:53PM +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote: > > We have to leave the 90s ideas, and think as younger people thinks nowadays I mean, really, you have to keep in mind that the Hurd originated in the 80s/90s, and is

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Richard Braun
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:24:50PM +0200, Jan Wielkiewicz wrote: > Please stop arguing, everyone. > I already made some notes about how to make the web page more readable, > we'll be judging the effects when its done. > Don't waste more time on arguing than it's worth. This discussion relates to t

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Richard Braun
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:10:53PM +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote: > > I don't want to work with people who give up because it takes them > > more than a few seconds to find information, or who evaluate a project > > based on the look of its web site. > This is a prejudice, in fact. The definition o

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Jan Wielkiewicz
Dnia 2020-08-19, o godz. 23:48:26 Samuel Thibault napisał(a): > Jan Wielkiewicz, le lun. 17 août 2020 01:33:41 +0200, a ecrit: > > > I know. That still does not mean I understand the *reasoning*. > > > > > Life is often about accidents, not about reasoning. > > Discovering something by accident

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Jan Wielkiewicz
Dnia 2020-08-20, o godz. 18:06:02 Richard Braun napisał(a): > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 03:19:56PM +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote: > > But, about the website, if I remember well, this thread started > > because of an offer to update the website. > > Why don't we accept the offer? > > > > It's a bad

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Almudena Garcia, le jeu. 20 août 2020 23:10:53 +0200, a ecrit: > We have to leave the 90s ideas, and think as younger people thinks nowadays > (It > don't refers to think as a teenager, simply remove elitists ideas and > prejudices about "who merit work in this project") It's not a question of me

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Almudena Garcia
> I don't want to work with people who give up because it takes them > more than a few seconds to find information, or who evaluate a project > based on the look of its web site. This is a prejudice, in fact. If we want to attract new users who can become contributors, we have to make the beginnin

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Richard Braun
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 03:19:56PM +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote: > But, about the website, if I remember well, this thread started because of > an offer to update the website. > Why don't we accept the offer? > > It's a bad idea to reject this type of offer only for prejudices about the > attracti

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Almudena Garcia
> The reason the Hurd doesn't have a good web site, or good documentation, or good performance, or > good device support, etc..., is the same as always : too few people. But, about the website, if I remember well, this thread started because of an offer to update the website. Why don't we accept th

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Richard Braun
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 02:32:03AM +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote: > > Every year or couple of year has its own marketting trend, and if you > > don't follow it each time (thus consuming your time just for that), > In fact, It's not necessary to follow the hype about a technology or a > trend. > But

Re: A few questions: Libre SoC, website, Rust

2020-08-20 Thread Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Samuel Thibault writes: > Almudena Garcia, le jeu. 20 août 2020 00:03:08 +0200, a ecrit: >> > But deciding to have a look at some project only because the website is all >> > shiny, no. >> It is more important than you're thinking now. > > AGAIN I'm saying it's not "important". What I'm saying i