Re: stat(x) & AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT

2020-11-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pino Toscano, le sam. 28 nov. 2020 20:09:57 +0100, a ecrit: > In data sabato 28 novembre 2020 20:02:52 CET, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > Pino Toscano, le sam. 28 nov. 2020 19:45:12 +0100, a ecrit: > > > Can AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT be (easily) implemented in the hurd lookup bits? > > > > I would say tha

Re: stat(x) & AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT

2020-11-28 Thread Pino Toscano
In data sabato 28 novembre 2020 20:02:52 CET, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > Hello Pino, > > Pino Toscano, le sam. 28 nov. 2020 19:45:12 +0100, a ecrit: > > Can AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT be (easily) implemented in the hurd lookup bits? > > I would say that it simply maps to O_NOTRANS? I thought about that;

Re: stat(x) & AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT

2020-11-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello Pino, Pino Toscano, le sam. 28 nov. 2020 19:45:12 +0100, a ecrit: > Can AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT be (easily) implemented in the hurd lookup bits? I would say that it simply maps to O_NOTRANS? Samuel

stat(x) & AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT

2020-11-28 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, while debugging failed test suites in gdk-pixbuf, I noticed the following: - newer glib versions can use statx - glib provides a statx emulation in case statx is not provided natively, falling back to the usual stat (with less information available) - the statx emulation allows few AT_* fl