Hi there!
Jan Wielkiewicz writes:
> Third question:
> Do you have anything against Rust contributions into the project? My
> friend is interested in contributing, but unfortunately in Rust, not C.
> I wonder if rump drivers could be written in Rust, thanks
> to the Hurd's modular architecture.
OK thanks for reply!
Best regards.
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi Nala Ginrut,
>
> I think it took a few weeks, but I also think you should ask whether
> they received your application. Would be really annoying if a technical
> error caused you to lose that.
>
>
Hi Arne!
Maybe it's out of the topic here, but I want to ask how long did you get the
reply from nlnet after you applied. I've applied for GNU Artanis since 20th
Nov, but no
reply so far. I don't know if I should ask positively.
Thanks!
Best regards.
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi,
>
>
> I
Joshua Branson writes:
> Nala Ginrut writes:
>
>> Hi folks!
>> I've planned to reimplement MIG or modern syntax in GNU Guile for
>> years. But I'm not sure how many people are interested in this work.
>
> Why the rewrite? Just curious.
I have some exp
Hi folks!
I've planned to reimplement MIG or modern syntax in GNU Guile for
years. But I'm not sure how many people are interested in this work.
Joshua Branson writes:
> Protonmail Me writes:
>
>> Dear Hurd Developers,
>>
>> I attempted to send below e-mail to the hurd-maintainters, but I foun
Hi all!
I'm glad to see there's still people interested in keeping improving
Hurd with L4 family.
Personally, I don't think "free OS kernel" is still the key reason why Hurd
exists today. Because it is one of the free OS kernel of GNU OS now
(with less users), it's the true fact. In this context,
