this the wrong way, but a while ago the
GDB project (following Glibc's lead) decided that we would
not add more "contributed by", "written by", etc. notes.
See here <https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist#Attribution>
and follow the link there for rationale.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 09/06/2017 11:11 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pedro Alves, on lun. 04 sept. 2017 13:14:33 +0100, wrote:
>> On 08/27/2017 07:41 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Since hurd's baf7e5c ('hurd: Use polymorphic port types to return some
>>> rights.'), some RPCs prototy
n-ToT Hurd systems? Is the intention to only ever support building
ToT gdb with ToT Hurd?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gnu-nat.c b/gdb/gnu-nat.c
> index d5e3841e68..402027866b 100644
> --- a/gdb/gnu-nat.c
> +++ b/gdb/gnu-nat.c
> @@ -1874,17 +1876,19 @@ ILL_RPC (S_proc_setmsgport_re
hname = (char *) xmalloc (pathlen + 1);
struct cleanup *old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, pathname);
hex2bin (p1, (gdb_byte *) pathname, pathlen);
pathname[pathlen] = '\0';
discard_cleanups (old_chain);
OK with that change.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 01/08/2014 09:20 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:17:21 +0100, Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what I pushed
..., and what made the Hurd port pretty unhappy. ;-)
Whoops. ;-) Thanks for fixing.
In the thread around
http://news.gmane.org/find
On 09/20/2013 01:43 AM, David Michael wrote:
Hi,
(Copying gdb-patches this time.)
But, we're missing all the context on the gdb-patches@ side.
Here is an updated patch to successfully build GDB after today's
Hurd/mig changes.
--
Pedro Alves
On 09/19/2013 09:30 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:40:40 +0800, Yue Lu hacklu.newb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/12/2013 04:05 AM, Yue Lu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Pedro Alves pal
/
2013-09-18 Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com
* gnu-nat.c (inf_validate_procs, gnu_wait, gnu_resume)
(gnu_create_inferior)
(gnu_attach, gnu_thread_alive, gnu_pid_to_str, cur_thread)
(set_sig_thread_cmd): Use the lwpid field of ptids to store the
thread id instead
-thread
(though I can't see how in the current code), and then setting
breakpoints, or other operations that require reading memory
would crash.
--
Pedro Alves
On 09/12/2013 04:05 AM, Yue Lu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com wrote:
This is what I meant:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-09/msg00253.html
I was thinking you'd wrap gnu_xfer_memory.
I have study your patch,
Thanks. Did you try building
On 09/18/2013 02:48 PM, Yue Lu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com wrote:
/me gives it a try.
I grepped for ptid_build and ptid_get_tid in *gnu* files, and
adjusted all I found.
I have tried this way before, but it doesn't work.
After apply your patch
?)
line-wrapped the patch. I just now tried saving the
whole email as an mbox file, and then applied it to a pristine
tree with git am, and saw no issues.
--
Pedro Alves
Hi!
On 09/05/2013 08:29 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
+static int
+gnu_read_memory (CORE_ADDR addr, unsigned char *myaddr, int length)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ task_t task = (gnu_current_inf
+ ? (gnu_current_inf-task
+? gnu_current_inf-task-port : 0) : 0);
+ if (task == MACH_PORT_NULL
On 09/05/2013 11:53 AM, Yue Lu wrote:
Hi,
This is the my new patch.
Thanks. Follows a few comments, by no means an in depth review.
We'll probably need to iterate a few times. I'm counting on
Thomas and others to help as well!
I'm actually very excited to see gdb and gdbserver sharing
a
that way. Moving them under gdb/nat/
can be left for a cleanup step further down the road.
Could we try that approach?
--
Pedro Alves
will want to run mig even on
cross gdbs hosted on GNU Hurd, though...
--
Pedro Alves
name itself should be lower case, but write it
in
upper case when you are speaking about the value rather than the variable
itself.
Thus, “the inode number NODE_NUM” rather than “an inode”.
--
Pedro Alves
).
What do you think about it? Could you try it if you like it?
--
Pedro Alves
2009-07-20 Pedro Alves pe...@codesourcery.com
* gnu-nat.c (gnu_mourn_inferior): Use the passed in target_ops
instead of the gnu_ops global.
(gnu_create_inferior): Inline `attach_to_child', use
;'' is missing.
Fixed.
Thanks. I'll commit the patch in a bit.
--
Pedro Alves
of handle_inferior_event logic :-( )
What do you guys think? Thomas, could you try the attached patch
on the Hurd, please? I just gave it a spin on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu
without regressions.
--
Pedro Alves
2008-10-13 Pedro Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fork-child.c (startup_inferior): Only set
going through
the shell doing fork/execs, we see new threads at every exec, and the
old threads disappear. Could you try adding a `switch_to_thread
(resume_thread)'
somewhere after target_wait returns and before any other target method?
--
Pedro Alves
);
+ target_resume (minus_one_ptid, 0, TARGET_SIGNAL_0);
The other thing I suggest to look at, is to make sure the
local `pending_execs' and the `gnu-nat.c:struct inf'::pending_execs
aren't in conflict, but it doesn't look like it.
Hope this helps.
--
Pedro Alves
built (natively) on the same up-to-date Debian GNU/Hurd
system.
For easy reproduction, I can publish the faulting binary.
Could you check what caused the breakage? It *may* have been the ptid
changes I made, or not.
2008-09-08 Pedro Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use ptid_t.tid to store
23 matches
Mail list logo
