On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:58:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> > This is strictly an internal GNU struggle, and has no relevance at all on
> > anything except how GNU is organized and what it means to be a GNU
> > maintainer.
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> This is strictly an internal GNU struggle, and has no relevance at all on
> anything except how GNU is organized and what it means to be a GNU
> maintainer. In particular, Thomas did _not_ get "dismissed from the HURD
> project" [si
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 04:27:59PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> >Just to say this is strictly an upstream issue about the Hurd itself, not
> >GNU/Hurd distributions. So I think help-hurd would be more appropiate than
> >debian-hurd for pointing this sort of things.
>
> IMO D
Robert Millan wrote:
Just to say this is strictly an upstream issue about the Hurd itself, not
GNU/Hurd distributions. So I think help-hurd would be more appropiate than
debian-hurd for pointing this sort of things.
IMO Debian is involved, because its attitude to GNU FDL is indirect
reason for thi
/* Cross-post to bug-hurd and debian-hurd. */
Hi,
The Hurd is in the news, but for unpleasant event. In case you missed
it: http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=5185
You have only missed it if you haven't followed the mailing list for
the past few years, or the CVS. Thomas h
Hi Ognyan!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> /* Cross-post to bug-hurd and debian-hurd. */
I'm glad that I have no comments on the "politics" :)
Just to say this is strictly an upstream issue about the Hurd itself, not
GNU/Hurd distributions. So I think help-hurd
/* Cross-post to bug-hurd and debian-hurd. */
Hi,
The Hurd is in the news, but for unpleasant event. In case you missed
it: http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=5185
Regards,
ogi
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org
