Hi!
On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT), Roland McGrath rol...@hack.frob.com
wrote:
First, my usual cleanup patch:
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ldsodefs.h (VALID_ELF_OSABI)
(VALID_ELF_ABIVERSION, MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA): Use ELFOSABI_GNU
instead of ELFOSABI_LINUX.
First, my usual cleanup patch:
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ldsodefs.h (VALID_ELF_OSABI)
(VALID_ELF_ABIVERSION, MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA): Use ELFOSABI_GNU
instead of ELFOSABI_LINUX.
ports/ChangeLog.arm
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ldsodefs.h (VALID_ELF_OSABI)
Hi!
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:19:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org
wrote:
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:46:20 -0700, a écrit :
Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
That seems appropriate to me.
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:46:20 -0700, a écrit :
Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
That seems appropriate to me.
Ok, here is an updated patch for the libc part.
Samuel
binutils started emitting ELF
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 10:48:12 -0700, a écrit :
Ground issue is this:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10549
gcc/glibc now uses GNU-specific extensions to the ELF format (GNU_IFUNC,
GNU_UNIQUE). For such cases, binutils now emits binaries with the
Well, it frightens me a bit to add something called LINUX in all GNU
systems: what if somebody adds something there that we don't want to add
to some GNU system? What if we want to add something for GNU/Hurd that
Linux people do not want to add?
The ABI is the value, not the name.
I know
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:04:38 -0700, a écrit :
Well, it frightens me a bit to add something called LINUX in all GNU
systems: what if somebody adds something there that we don't want to add
to some GNU system? What if we want to add something for GNU/Hurd that
Linux people do
Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
That seems appropriate to me. I don't really care about the names. It's
certainly the case that there never should have been, and never should be,
any material distinction between
