Hi!
On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT), Roland McGrath
wrote:
> > First, my "usual" cleanup patch:
> >
> > * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ldsodefs.h (VALID_ELF_OSABI)
> > (VALID_ELF_ABIVERSION, MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA): Use ELFOSABI_GNU
> > instead of ELFOSABI_LINUX.
> >
> > ports/Ch
> First, my "usual" cleanup patch:
>
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ldsodefs.h (VALID_ELF_OSABI)
> (VALID_ELF_ABIVERSION, MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA): Use ELFOSABI_GNU
> instead of ELFOSABI_LINUX.
>
> ports/ChangeLog.arm
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ldsodefs.h (VALID_ELF_OSABI)
Hi!
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:19:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:46:20 -0700, a écrit :
> > > Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
> > > ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
> >
> > That seems appropriate to me.
..., and hap
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:46:20 -0700, a écrit :
> > Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
> > ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
>
> That seems appropriate to me.
Ok, here is an updated patch for the libc part.
Samuel
binutils started emitting ELF
> Ok, so I guess we should request binutils to rename the LINUX one into
> ELFOSABI_GNU and drop the HURD one?
That seems appropriate to me. I don't really care about the names. It's
certainly the case that there never should have been, and never should be,
any material distinction between GNU/L
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 11:04:38 -0700, a écrit :
> > Well, it frightens me a bit to add something called "LINUX" in all GNU
> > systems: what if somebody adds something there that we don't want to add
> > to some GNU system? What if we want to add something for GNU/Hurd that
> > Linux p
> Well, it frightens me a bit to add something called "LINUX" in all GNU
> systems: what if somebody adds something there that we don't want to add
> to some GNU system? What if we want to add something for GNU/Hurd that
> Linux people do not want to add?
The ABI is the value, not the name.
> I k
Roland McGrath, le Sun 19 Jun 2011 10:48:12 -0700, a écrit :
> > Ground issue is this:
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10549
> > gcc/glibc now uses GNU-specific extensions to the ELF format (GNU_IFUNC,
> > GNU_UNIQUE). For such cases, binutils now emits binaries with the
> > GNU/
