Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Tue 05 Oct 2010 12:24:35 +0200, a écrit :
> On 05/10/10 01:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Emilio, any update on this patch according to Fredrik's comments?
> > I could easily add it as a patch in Debian's libc.
>
> I already updated it, see 4c62d794@gmail.com
Ah, so
Hi,
On 05/10/10 01:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Emilio, any update on this patch according to Fredrik's comments?
> I could easily add it as a patch in Debian's libc.
I already updated it, see 4c62d794@gmail.com
I've tried it again with Manuel Menal's fix and my testcase works, although the
Emilio, any update on this patch according to Fredrik's comments?
I could easily add it as a patch in Debian's libc.
Samuel
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:02:12PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/08/10 21:02, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > Another thing that crossed my mind is what'll happen if SCM_CREDS is
> > also sent in the future? Because it also involves port, your code will
> > fail because of the
o, don't forget to comment tricky requirements like this.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here.
Regards,
Emilio
>From 1b911148009f696717da0b676d6d10af85d5aefb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:09:13 +0200
Subject:
In the Hurd, nothing implicitly changes what your controlling tty is.
Only TIOCSCTTY does that (see libc/hurd/hurdioctl.c).
However, any fd you receive in any fashion might be an fd to your
controlling tty, so you have to discover and then treat it as such.
_hurd_intern_fd takes care of this for y
Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Sun 01 Aug 2010 21:02:57 +0200, a écrit :
> What about CTTYs? To be honest, I don't know much about them myself.
> They sound like something very process specific so I don't *think* we need
> to transfer anything, but do we need to set them to something on receive?
> I don'
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> This patch adds support for SCM_RIGHTS to glibc. It works fine
> when sending file descriptors from a socket() or a socketpair() call,
> but not from e.g. an open() call, as I've mentioned in another mail.
> That's no
#if set to 1 (i.e. sending
socket fds).
Regards,
Emilio
>From bd70862e18ba6c2a404917bffef72de367a3b132 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:09:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add support to send file descriptors over Unix sockets
---
sysdeps/mach/hurd/rec
