Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-19 Thread Joshua Branson
Svante Signell writes: > On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 19:01 +, jbra...@dismail.de wrote: >> May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote: >> >> > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de  >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the >> >

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-19 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 19:01 +, jbra...@dismail.de wrote: > May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote: > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de  > > wrote: > > > > > +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the > > > +32-bit support, once the 64-bit

Re: [PATCH] * faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info * open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joshua Branson, le mer. 17 mai 2023 15:41:01 -0400, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault writes: > > I have restored some pieces which are not outdated (we still do have > > 32-on-64 > > plans, and running 32bit on 64bit hardware is still something people > > have to understand possible). > > That is

Re: [PATCH] * faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info * open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-17 Thread Joshua Branson
Samuel Thibault writes: > Hello, > > I have restored some pieces which are not outdated (we still do have 32-on-64 > plans, and running 32bit on 64bit hardware is still something people > have to understand possible). That is totally fine with me. May I ask why we might pursue supporting

Re: [PATCH] * faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info * open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I have restored some pieces which are not outdated (we still do have 32-on-64 plans, and running 32bit on 64bit hardware is still something people have to understand possible). Thanks, Samuel jbra...@dismail.de, le mer. 17 mai 2023 09:53:01 -0400, a ecrit: > --- > faq/64-bit.mdwn

[PATCH] * faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info * open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-17 Thread jbra...@dismail.de
--- faq/64-bit.mdwn | 15 --- open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn index 2e1278cb..9c8ecc9c 100644 --- a/faq/64-bit.mdwn +++ b/faq/64-bit.mdwn @@ -13,11 +13,12 @@

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le lun. 15 mai 2023 20:51:54 +0300, a ecrit: > store (= rumpdisk, not ramdisk) and nano? :) FI nano is now available as debian-amd64 package since a few days :) Samuel

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Guy-Fleury Iteriteka
On May 15, 2023 7:51:54 PM GMT+02:00, Sergey Bugaev wrote: >On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 7:28 PM Guy-Fleury Iteriteka > wrote: >> Yes, i know that. I fallow you on mastodon. > >Then you get to see all the shitposts :D > All posts yes :) >> Also as you are good in writing you can documents how you

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 7:28 PM Guy-Fleury Iteriteka wrote: > Yes, i know that. I fallow you on mastodon. Then you get to see all the shitposts :D > Also as you are good in writing you can documents how you created and launch > it but when you finished your great work Ah, :blush: thank you

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Guy-Fleury Iteriteka
On May 15, 2023 6:45:40 PM GMT+02:00, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Guy-Fleury Iteriteka, le lun. 15 mai 2023 18:28:36 +0200, a ecrit: >> It should be interesting to use flavio's script. > >I don't think Flavio aims to bootstrap various libraries and whatnot :) > I meant to test just the hurd core

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Joshua Branson
Sergey Bugaev writes: > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:12 PM Guy-Fleury Iteriteka > wrote: >> On May 15, 2023 4:38:34 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" >> wrote: >> >+As of May 2023, the Hurd developers have a bootable 64-bit Debian >> Are sure a debian hurd boot?? > > I'm rather sure some patches

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le sam. 13 mai 2023 20:45:35 +0300, a ecrit: > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de wrote: > > +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the > > +32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable. > > Is this really the plan? :( No,

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Guy-Fleury Iteriteka, le lun. 15 mai 2023 18:28:36 +0200, a ecrit: > It should be interesting to use flavio's script. I don't think Flavio aims to bootstrap various libraries and whatnot :) Samuel

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Guy-Fleury Iteriteka
On May 15, 2023 5:58:12 PM GMT+02:00, Sergey Bugaev wrote: >On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:12 PM Guy-Fleury Iteriteka > wrote: >> On May 15, 2023 4:38:34 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" >> wrote: >> >+As of May 2023, the Hurd developers have a bootable 64-bit Debian >> Are sure a debian hurd

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:12 PM Guy-Fleury Iteriteka wrote: > On May 15, 2023 4:38:34 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" > wrote: > >+As of May 2023, the Hurd developers have a bootable 64-bit Debian > Are sure a debian hurd boot?? I'm rather sure some patches required to get anything serious

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Joshua Branson
Guy-Fleury Iteriteka writes: > On May 15, 2023 4:38:34 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" > wrote: >>--- >>I explained that the Hurd has initial 64-bit support, but I >>did not mention if the project plans to drop 32-bit >>support. Joshua >> >> faq/64-bit.mdwn | 10 +++--- >>

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread Guy-Fleury Iteriteka
On May 15, 2023 4:38:34 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" wrote: >--- >I explained that the Hurd has initial 64-bit support, but I >did not mention if the project plans to drop 32-bit >support. Joshua > > faq/64-bit.mdwn | 10 +++--- > open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +-

[PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-15 Thread jbra...@dismail.de
--- I explained that the Hurd has initial 64-bit support, but I did not mention if the project plans to drop 32-bit support. Joshua faq/64-bit.mdwn | 10 +++--- open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-13 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 14/05/2023 7:01 am, jbranso wrote: May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbranso wrote: +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the +32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable. Is this really the plan? :( Has

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-13 Thread jbranso
May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de wrote: > >> +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the >> +32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable. > > Is this really the plan? :( > > Has this been

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-13 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de wrote: > +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the > +32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable. Is this really the plan? :( Has this been discussed anywhere? I understand that supporting multiple

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-13 Thread Guy-Fleury Iteriteka
On May 13, 2023 6:38:15 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" wrote: >--- > faq/64-bit.mdwn | 11 --- > open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn >index 2e1278cb..36afbbc3 100644

[PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

2023-05-13 Thread jbra...@dismail.de
--- faq/64-bit.mdwn | 11 --- open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn index 2e1278cb..36afbbc3 100644 --- a/faq/64-bit.mdwn +++ b/faq/64-bit.mdwn @@ -13,11 +13,8 @@