Hello,
To bring the result of reviews of the ``--mount'' patch series
together, I am posting the latest patches in a new subthread. Since
the discussion tree has become sufficiently messy, I'm asking those
who would like to comment to stick with this subthread and reply to
old messages only if it
Hello,
All the patches in this patch series have already been reviewed and
quite many changes have been introduced. It's time for me to post the
corrected patches, which I'm doing right now.
Note, that PATCH 2/3 has changed essentially in the meantime: antrik
said it would be good to have the mo
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:35:39AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:59:18PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > This implementation of unionmount implements lazy translator startup,
> > because it is impossible to start the mountee during the
> > initialization
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:59:18PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> This implementation of unionmount implements lazy translator startup,
> because it is impossible to start the mountee during the
> initialization of unionfs. The reason is that most translators (at
> least) try to stat their und
Hello,
I'm doing another series of patches regarding project unionmount and
I'll start with explaining why I do this while the first series of
patches has not been completely approved.
antrik suggested that I should implement the unionmount functionality
*first*, and only then focus on trimming t
