Marin Ramesa, le Wed 20 Nov 2013 22:22:41 +0100, a écrit :
> On 20.11.2013 22:10:54, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Marin Ramesa, le Wed 20 Nov 2013 20:42:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > > * i386/i386/db_trace.c (db_i386_reg_value): Return reg value.
> >
> > I don't see the returned value used anywhere. I'd
On 20.11.2013 22:10:54, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Marin Ramesa, le Wed 20 Nov 2013 20:42:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > * i386/i386/db_trace.c (db_i386_reg_value): Return reg value.
>
> I don't see the returned value used anywhere. I'd say rather drop it
> than returning something which is already return
Marin Ramesa, le Wed 20 Nov 2013 20:42:54 +0100, a écrit :
> * i386/i386/db_trace.c (db_i386_reg_value): Return reg value.
I don't see the returned value used anywhere. I'd say rather drop it
than returning something which is already returned another way.
> ---
> i386/i386/db_trace.c | 1 +
> 1
* i386/i386/db_trace.c (db_i386_reg_value): Return reg value.
---
i386/i386/db_trace.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/i386/i386/db_trace.c b/i386/i386/db_trace.c
index 419fa0c..71b7620 100644
--- a/i386/i386/db_trace.c
+++ b/i386/i386/db_trace.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ db_i386_re
