Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-12 09:19:54)
> Justus Winter, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 15:34:13 +0200, a écrit :
> > --- a/libmachdev/device.defs
> > +++ b/libmachdev/device.defs
>
> That being said, I guess we should be using gnumach's .defs?
Yes, some day, but for now this device.defs has the two ex
Justus Winter, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 15:34:13 +0200, a écrit :
> --- a/libmachdev/device.defs
> +++ b/libmachdev/device.defs
That being said, I guess we should be using gnumach's .defs?
Samuel
Justus Winter, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 15:34:13 +0200, a écrit :
> Previously, the device definitions were filtered using sed to replace
> the device_t type with mach_port_send_t to make the device argument of
> device_open polymorphic. Rather than doing that, which makes it
> impossible to use transla
Previously, the device definitions were filtered using sed to replace
the device_t type with mach_port_send_t to make the device argument of
device_open polymorphic. Rather than doing that, which makes it
impossible to use translation functions, the definition of device_open
has been amended.
* l
