[bug #48456] mig-generated user code does not destroy invalid reply

2016-08-31 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #48456 (project hurd): I wrote: "This could perhaps be used for denial of service, if a long-lived process calls a less-trusted one." The exec server is a long-lived process, and it calls several RPC routines on the FILE and OLDTASK passed to exec_exec, which can be call

[bug #48456] mig-generated user code does not destroy invalid reply

2016-07-10 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
URL: Summary: mig-generated user code does not destroy invalid reply Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: kon Submitted on: Sun Jul 10 11:56:21 2016 Category: GNU MIG Se