[bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2006-05-08 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of bug #7118 (project hurd): Status: Confirmed => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #4: I committed the follow

[bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2006-05-08 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of bug #7118 (project hurd): Item Group:None => Hardware Support Assigned to:None => tschwinge Planned Release:None => GNU Mach 1.4

Re: [bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2006-01-08 Thread Gianluca Guida
Hi, Adding more memory to kernel mapping is indeed a good idea (stomach has a rough hack that does the same almost). Just another bothering question: On 1/9/06, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - kernel_virtual_end = phys_last_addr + morevm; > + kernel_virtual_end = phys_

Re: [bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2006-01-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Here is the patch inline. The "15" factor is somewhat arbiratry... [gnumach]/Changelog 2006-01-09 Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * i386/i386at/model_dep.c(mem_size_init): Limit memory to what gnumach is able to use (minus a little extra for virtual mappings).

[bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2006-01-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #7118 (project hurd): Hi, There were two problems, which the attached patch addresses. - The area for kernel mappings was limited to an arbitrary limit of 40MB. This is enough for managing up to ~700MB, but not more (because of some memory management structures), so I

[bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2005-12-31 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Update of bug #7118 (project hurd): Status:None => Confirmed ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Can also be reproduced in qemu by setting the amount of avaiable memory to >= 1GiB. __

[bug #7118] GNU Mach can't handle 1G memory

2005-12-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #7118 (project hurd): Here is additionnal information from http://bugs.debian.org/226609: Message received at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (full text, mbox): From: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Processed: R