Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > you still need a way to access the actual burner... I don't > > really know, but I rather doubt that any VM solution actually exposes > > the host system's burner to the guest system as an ATA

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-17 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > you still need a way to access the actual burner... I don't > really know, but I rather doubt that any VM solution actually exposes > the host system's burner to the guest system as an ATAPI device > connected to a virtual PATA controller... libburn does not t

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:57:21PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > An interested user who really wants to burn CD, DVD, or BD, would be > an extra motivation. :)) Well, if I can find some working DVD drive for my Linux box, I could transfer the burner to the Hurd box :-) However, I hardly do

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:05:40AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > The test machine is a 4x 64 bit AMD with ethernet on mainboard. > >From /var/log/messages of Debian 5: > r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded > eth0: RTL8168c/8111c at 0xc263, [...] If the network ad

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 14 May 2011 09:05:40 +0200, a écrit : > r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded > eth0: RTL8168c/8111c at 0xc263, [...] Won't be supported. > Can this be circumvented by running Hurd on a virtual machine ? Sure: just tell your virtual machine manage

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, me: > A potential problem is that scsi_ioctl_send_command() is restricted > to transfer MAX_BUF = PAGE_SIZE payload bytes. Samuel Thibault: > Page size on i386 is 4KiB. > > I am unable to determine whether this limit also applies to scsi_do_cmd() > > in hurd/gnumach/linux/src/drivers/scsi/sc

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schmitt, le Mon 09 May 2011 12:57:21 +0200, a écrit : > A potential problem is that scsi_ioctl_send_command() is restricted > to transfer MAX_BUF = PAGE_SIZE payload bytes. > I could not spot the definition of PAGE_SIZE yet. Page size on i386 is 4KiB. > In scsi_ioctl.c:scsi_ioctl_send_comm

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-09 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Thanks to all for your patience with my newbieness. me: > > So it looks as if we have to stop here until a better skilled person > > appears who is interested in enabling burner drive operation. Samuel Thibault: > I'll let it to anybody who has time for this. After pondering and code reading

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 08:42:53PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > > So i would rather propose a new function with the semantics of > > > SG_IO: > > > > A completely hurdish interface for this would probably be the best, > > yes. [...] > I understand the recent statements about the reason be

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:41:23PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I meanwhile downloaded machuse.ps which drives my gv to the edge of > madness. It starts at page 20 and i can only go backwards page by > page. Probably i should make 20 screenshots for reading them in > sequence. You could tr

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schmitt, le Sun 10 Apr 2011 22:41:23 +0200, a écrit : > > > So what is Hurd's attitude towards a driver that occupies 2.5 MB > > > of memory when idle and might expand much more on the job ? > > > Is it worth to continue thinking about xorriso-in-the-system ? > > > > Not a problem in a Hurd

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-12 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:32:10PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sun 10 Apr 2011 06:43:04 +0200, a écrit : > > i would like to check out whether there is documentation > > or an interested tutor for the tasks of listing all MMC drives, getting > > (exclusive) acc

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > There's the "Documentation" link on this page which I believe has all > the links that exist. I meanwhile downloaded machuse.ps which drives my gv to the edge of madness. It starts at page 20 and i can only go backwards page by page. Probably i should make 20 screenshots for reading them in

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, (Shall i stop CC'ing help-hurd ?) > > So i would rather propose a new function with the semantics of SG_IO: > > A completely hurdish interface for this would probably be the best, yes. > You'll have to learn mig, however :) Well, the SG_IO-ish wrapper around scsi_do_cmd() would be a matter

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > That interface isn't complete: the GNU Mach kernel uses linux drivers > internally, and the scsi_ioctl() function is available there (thus with > the linuxish interface), but its features have not been propagated to > the device_get/set_status() user interface yet. I see. Googling "hurd de

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schmitt, le Sun 10 Apr 2011 20:42:53 +0200, a écrit : > (Shall i stop CC'ing help-hurd ?) It's not useful indeed. > Its own usage model is command-and-reply. Like a shell script or dialog > session. Seems to fit nicely into > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/mig.html > (

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schmitt, le Sun 10 Apr 2011 17:13:25 +0200, a écrit : > So i would rather propose a new function with the semantics of SG_IO: > - A drive handle. > - A struct to take parameters and results of the transaction > (Linux has sg_io_hdr_t). A completely hurdish interface for this would probabl

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sun 10 Apr 2011 06:43:04 +0200, a écrit : > i would like to check out whether there is documentation > or an interested tutor for the tasks of listing all MMC drives, getting > (exclusive) access to a drive, sending SCSI commands, getting reply > data and error indicatio

[scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-04-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Forwarding to appropriate list... - Forwarded message from Thomas Schmitt - Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:17:13 +0200 From: Thomas Schmitt To: help-h...@gnu.org Subject: Interface for SCSI transactions ? Hi, i would like to explore the possibilities to let GNU xorriso burn CD, DVD or BD m