[...] but I have no idea where I must post/show/give/upload these
modifyed files.
For now, just post them here. Anyone who follows MachRevival also
follows the action on GNU Mach. And patches that end up in GNU Mach
will with most certanty end up in MachRevival. MachRevival will
probobly
On 1/30/06, Gianluca Guida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hey Gianluca
well bug-hurd is not properly the right place to discuss this, butI'll keep this discussion public in case someone is interested.
The Revival Project is quite an informal thing. It has born as a
Sergio Lopez's idea mainly,
Note that for fixes that are more advanced than adding some casts
to get rid of compile-time warnings or similar, we'd like you to
assign the copyright of your changes to the FSF.
Papers are not needed (but nice to have) for GNU Mach. They are a
must for the Hurd though. Or that is how
I'm a bit confuse about how mach revival project will work in some
aspects. I'm on the task to clean up gnumach code and I already made
some progress removing warnings from compile proccess, as gianluca
said, but I have no idea where I must post/show/give/upload these
modifyed files. Maybe I must
Hi,
well bug-hurd is not properly the right place to discuss this, but
I'll keep this discussion public in case someone is interested.
On 1/30/06, Matheus Morais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a bit confuse about how mach revival project will work in some aspects.
The Revival Project is quite an
