Hi,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:42:22AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Over a period of a couple of weeks (mostly light load), many things
> become increasingly more sluggish; until finally the system dies with
> paging errors. Swap usage also rises constantly over this time,
> generally
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:40 +0200, Sergio López wrote:
> An easy way to reproduce this, is
> sending a SIGINT in the middle of an opertation like "dd if=/dev/zero
> of=test.bin bs=1M count=100".
>
> I think threads running vm_fault_copy doesn't deal properly with
> thread_abort, but I didn't have
2011/9/22 Svante Signell :
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 04:45 +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:42:22AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>>
>> > As recently I aquired the (bad) habit of running my system 24/7,
>> > almost never voluntarily rebooting, I wa
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 04:45 +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > Hi,
..
> several /bin/bash -noprofile /dev/fd/3 in state Sslo
These seems to be started by /libexec/runttys, so they should probably
be there. State flag 'o' still unex
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 04:45:55 +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:42:22AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > As recently I aquired the (bad) habit of running my system 24/7,
> > almost never voluntarily rebooting, I was able to make further
> > observations.
>
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 04:45 +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:42:22AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> > As recently I aquired the (bad) habit of running my system 24/7,
> > almost never voluntarily rebooting, I was able to make further
> > observ
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:42:22AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> As recently I aquired the (bad) habit of running my system 24/7,
> almost never voluntarily rebooting, I was able to make further
> observations.
I totally forgot to mention another important bit: the growing swap
con
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:42:22AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> The slowdown might be a result of the growing memory usage, causing a
> need to swap all the time. There is no audible thrashing though while
> the system behaves sluggish... And also, it wouldn't explain the crash
> while t
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Mon 05 Sep 2011 06:42:22 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:32:03AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > Building a certain GCC configuration on a freshly booted system: 11 h.
> > Remove build tree, build it again (2nd): 12 h 50 min. Huh. Remove
> > build tr
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:32:03AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Building a certain GCC configuration on a freshly booted system: 11 h.
> Remove build tree, build it again (2nd): 12 h 50 min. Huh. Remove
> build tree, reboot, build it again (1st): back to 11 h. Remove build
> tree, build
Hi!
Building a certain GCC configuration on a freshly booted system: 11 h.
Remove build tree, build it again (2nd): 12 h 50 min. Huh. Remove build
tree, reboot, build it again (1st): back to 11 h. Remove build tree,
build it again (2nd): 12 h 40 min. Remove build tree, build it again
(3rd): 15
11 matches
Mail list logo