Am Mittwoch 11 Juni 2008 03:56:06 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That means, that the Mercurial people say, that history should be
preserved in most cases, so it wasn't first priority.
This is precisely the sort of policy decisions that the software should
not impose upon users.
Git decided
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:39:51AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Samstag 07 Juni 2008 18:19:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Err... Does that mean that Mercurial doesn't even offer rebase (and
it can't be implemented trivially)?!
That means, that the Mercurial people say, that
Sorry, forgot to forward to the list...
But while I'm at it: To me pathological doesn't mean bad, but simply a very
seldomly appearing case, as out maths profs use it - I just realized that
the expression could be easily taken wrong.
And: Many thanks for the info about changes in Linux! The
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:38:53AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
I'm interested in how they are going to tackle that in the Summer of
Code project.
I didn't find information about the way they want to do it in the
short description (and I don't have the time to investigate right
Am Samstag 07 Juni 2008 18:19:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Err... Does that mean that Mercurial doesn't even offer rebase (and it
can't be implemented trivially)?!
That means, that the Mercurial people say, that history should be preserved in
most cases, so it wasn't first priority.
It can
Am Mittwoch 04 Juni 2008 07:33:10 schrieb Ivan Shmakov:
Mercurial offers the same, for GNU/Linux and Windows.
Indeed.
I assume that it will break the hard link as soon as a change is
committed for the file?
Yes (I just tested it).
Result: As soon as you commit a
