Samuel Thibault, on Mon 19 Dec 2016 00:25:35 +0100, wrote:
> as the attached patch does, which should really be applied or done
> any other way.
Or rather this patch, which makes it more like the test above.
Matthias, I'm committing this to Debian's gcc-6, along the other go
patches from Svante.
Hello,
Svante Signell, on Fri 25 Nov 2016 20:57:26 +0100, wrote:
> Another more annoying gnumch/hurd/glibc bug is that the
> built program go (go-6 in Debian) gets killed when executed from the
> shell vi path, but not when issued directly: /usr/bin/go-6 works fine.
> go-6
> Segmentation fault (c
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> I'm sorry but neither of you or I are in the position to request changes of
> already existing file names e.g. replacing linux with glibc in:
> os/pipe_linux.go
> crypto/x509/root_linux.go
> syscall/errstr_linux.go
As you know, the name "l
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 17:25 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Wed 07 Dec 2016 15:32:31 +0100, wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Ok, but then I'd say move the function which change to a separate file,
> > > so that the other functions are kep
Svante Signell, on Wed 07 Dec 2016 15:32:31 +0100, wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Ok, but then I'd say move the function which change to a separate file,
> > so that the other functions are kept shared.
> > Otherwise it'll be tedious to maintain.
>
> One pro
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Wed 07 Dec 2016 14:52:35 +0100, wrote:
> > Since go does not have a preprocessor allowing conditional code paths this
> > is
> > how it should be done (and as I did):
> > http://blog.ralch.com/tutorial/golang-conditional
Svante Signell, on Wed 07 Dec 2016 14:52:35 +0100, wrote:
> Since go does not have a preprocessor allowing conditional code paths this is
> how it should be done (and as I did):
> http://blog.ralch.com/tutorial/golang-conditional-compilation/
Ok, but then I'd say move the function which change to
On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 18:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, on Sun 27 Nov 2016 17:33:52 +0100, wrote:
> > > >
> > > And
> > > src_libgo_go_syscall_syscall_gnu_test.go: New file:
> > > Define Type and Whence as 32bit in syscall.Flock_t
> > >
> > > Again, you'll probab
Svante Signell, on Sun 27 Nov 2016 18:17:17 +0100, wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 18:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > But as you wish, an updated patch is attached.
> >
> > _Bool
> > Continued (uint32_t *w)
> > {
> > +#ifndef WCONTINUED
> > + *w = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > +#else
> > re
On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 18:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
...
> > But as you wish, an updated patch is attached.
>
> _Bool
> Continued (uint32_t *w)
> {
> +#ifndef WCONTINUED
> + *w = 0;
> + return 0;
> +#else
> return WIFCONTINUED (*w) != 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> Err, recheck the s
Hello,
Svante Signell, on Sun 27 Nov 2016 17:33:52 +0100, wrote:
> > > Index: gcc-6-6.2.1-4.1/src/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c
> > > ===
> > > --- gcc-6-6.2.1-4.1.orig/src/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c
> > > +++ gcc-6-6.2.1-4.1/src/libgo/go/sysc
On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 00:17 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Nice work!
Thanks :)
> Mmm, why making changes in each file in a separate patch? I don't
> think
> it makes things easier to review, I'd say rather send a big patch,
> it's
> altogether that it makes sense anyway.
It's just
Hello,
Nice work!
Mmm, why making changes in each file in a separate patch? I don't think
it makes things easier to review, I'd say rather send a big patch, it's
altogether that it makes sense anyway.
> Index: gcc-6-6.2.1-4.1/src/libgo/Makefile.in
> =
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-6 (6-6.2.1-5).
The first three patches are Debian-specific:
* debian_rules.defs.diff: Enables build of gccgo for GNU/Hurd
Define patches for the generated series file:
* debian_rules.patch.diff: Enables split-
14 matches
Mail list logo
