Hello!
I think there's some misunderstanding or miscommunication here.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:56PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The skips are there because those msgids were used for something different
> in the past. It's best not to reuse them.
I'm aware of that and in fact that's ex
The skips are there because those msgids were used for something different
in the past. It's best not to reuse them.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 25 Apr 2007 15:32:28 +0200, a ?crit :
> > As there is already at least one person (Samuel) to use the
> > `i386_set_gdt' and `i386_get_gdt' routines on GNU Mach (in glibc)
>
> I'm not using it: the c
Hi,
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 25 Apr 2007 15:32:28 +0200, a écrit :
> As there is already at least one person (Samuel) to use the
> `i386_set_gdt' and `i386_get_gdt' routines on GNU Mach (in glibc)
I'm not using it: the code in glibc is still not enabled. I'd say
gnumach1 should be fixed instead.
Hello!
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:39:25PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/hurd
> Module name: gnumach
> Branch: gnumach-1-branch
> Changes by: Samuel Thibault 06/11/05 20:39:25
>
> Modified files:
> . : ChangeLog
> i386/i386
