Not sure how I missed that; will grep for any others.
James
On 14 Aug 2015, at 13:16, Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de
wrote:
Quoting James Clarke (2015-07-23 19:33:42)
diff --git a/libdiskfs/disk-pager.c b/libdiskfs/disk-pager.c
index 008aa2d..33b109c 100644
---
Quoting James Clarke (2015-07-23 19:33:42)
diff --git a/libdiskfs/disk-pager.c b/libdiskfs/disk-pager.c
index 008aa2d..33b109c 100644
--- a/libdiskfs/disk-pager.c
+++ b/libdiskfs/disk-pager.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
__thread struct disk_image_user *diskfs_exception_diu;
struct pager
Hi!
First, thanks for working on this issue!
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:06:24 +0200, Justus Winter
4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
What happened to the corresponding fatfs change though? Isofs is
read-only, and tmpfs' diskfs_reload_global_state is a nop too. So
modulo the missing
Quoting Justus Winter (2015-07-25 03:54:59)
I'm merely wondering whether we shouldn't protect
diskfs_reload_global_state with a lock. I'm not sure if concurrent
remounts are a problem, but they could very well be.
For the record, this is not a problem. There is the global
diskfs_fsys_lock
Hi James :)
Quoting James Clarke (2015-07-23 19:33:42)
On some systems, ext2fs.static would regularly hang at startup, as a
race condition meant it would process paging requests while remounting.
To fix this, libpager has been altered to allow inhibiting and resuming
its worker threads, and