El 14/8/21 a les 23:26, Svante Signell ha escrit:
How to make lwip by default enabled instead of pfinet?
settrans -fgap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/lwip -6 /servers/socket/26
Svante Signell, le sam. 14 août 2021 23:26:55 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 18:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > The GPLv2-only code is essentially the pfinet stack from Linux, for
> > which we don't have any assignment anyway. But again, this is getting
> > replaced by lwip.
>
>
On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 18:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The GPLv2-only code is essentially the pfinet stack from Linux, for
> which we don't have any assignment anyway. But again, this is getting
> replaced by lwip.
Hello.
How to make lwip by default enabled instead of pfinet?
Thanks :)
Michael Banck writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 02:19:12PM +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Michael Banck writes:
>>
>> > I don't mind that, but I also think the Hurd is not a tactical FSF asset
>> > anymore that needs to be kept under tight control. The FSF has enough
>> >
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 02:19:12PM +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Michael Banck writes:
>
> > I don't mind that, but I also think the Hurd is not a tactical FSF asset
> > anymore that needs to be kept under tight control. The FSF has enough
> > copyright in the Hurd that it can
Michael Banck writes:
> I don't mind that, but I also think the Hurd is not a tactical FSF asset
> anymore that needs to be kept under tight control. The FSF has enough
> copyright in the Hurd that it can enforce it whenever it likes, even if
> other people's copyrighted code (as is already the
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 8:43 AM Michael Banck wrote:
> The fact that this process potentially or apparently took (or rather,
> has been taking) months for Sergey (I don't know when it was initiated),
> is a pretty good indicator that it is more than a nuisance.
Well, this is partly my own fault:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:18:20PM +1000, Damien Zammit wrote:
> On 11/8/21 11:01 pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > It would be interesting to consider dropping the copyright assignment
> > requirement for Hurd/Mach/MiG. For what remains primarily a hobby
> > project, this looks to me like a
> On 2021-08-12 12:18:20 +1000, Damien Zammit wrote:
> On 11/8/21 11:01 pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
This seem somewhat off-topic for the lists, so I’m open to
suggestions on what other forum to use (should anyone wish
to continue this thread.) My suggestion is, as
Maxime Devos writes:
> Upgrading the GPLv2-only code might be dificult if multiple people hold
> the copyright, so for the GPLv2-only code, it might be a good idea to still
> require copyright assignment.
When we did it for Mercurial, going from GPLv2 only to or later took
years and a *lot* of
Maxime Devos, le ven. 13 août 2021 15:42:37 +0200, a ecrit:
> so for the GPLv2-only code, it might be a good idea to still
> require copyright assignment.
The GPLv2-only code is essentially the pfinet stack from Linux, for
which we don't have any assignment anyway. But again, this is getting
Damien Zammit schreef op do 12-08-2021 om 12:18 [+1000]:
> Hi Ludo,
I'm not Ludo, but here's my response anyway.
(I'm interested in doing some small and larger things with the Hurd,
but I keep being occupied by other things and I'm having a hard time
understanding the inner workings ...)
> On
Hi Ludo,
On 11/8/21 11:01 pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It would be interesting to consider dropping the copyright assignment
> requirement for Hurd/Mach/MiG. For what remains primarily a hobby
> project, this looks to me like a hindrance more than anything else.
I imagine it is slightly
13 matches
Mail list logo
