On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:59:47PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Clearly, documentation is a problem with the Hurd. It's incomplete,
> scattered and stale. Working on it is helpful, if done appropriately.
In any case, IMHO the most useful documentation improvements would be in
the Hurd manual and
Scribit Arne Babenhauserheide dies 21/03/2008 hora 12:08:
> To do it efficiently, I'll need an account at the hurd box to be able
> to work directly on the git repository (instead of waiting minutes for
> my changes to be saved).
Not that you can also clone and pull by HTTP, and send the patches
El Thursday, 20 de March de 2008 12:42:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Well, for 0.3, the amount of changes is so great that it probably
> doesn't make much sense to list them all. Rather, the release notes
> should only contain a general description of the status; what doesn't
> work, and what wo
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:46:23AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> El Wednesday, 19 de March de 2008 16:05:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> escribió:
> > Too bad -- I hoped you would *write* the notes... ;-)
>
> When I find a list of sources for features, I can do that...
>
> But for that I fi
