Marin Ramesa, le Sat 16 Nov 2013 16:39:01 +0100, a écrit :
> Plus, it's a repetitive patch series, so I assumed the better solution
> is to compress it and send it as an attachment.
More than being repetitive, register dropping is trivial to review and
obviously correct, so there is essentially no
On 16.11.2013 17:12:37, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:39:01PM +0100, Marin Ramesa wrote:
> > I assumed it's inconvinient for people to suddenly find 32 messages
> > in
>
> We think of it (and our viewers make us see it) as one thread, not 32
> messages.
I have threading turne
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:39:01PM +0100, Marin Ramesa wrote:
> I assumed it's inconvinient for people to suddenly find 32 messages in
We think of it (and our viewers make us see it) as one thread, not 32
messages.
--
Richard Braun
On 16.11.2013 16:15:45, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 15:47:00 +0100, Marin Ramesa wrote:
> > Attached is a gzipped series of 32 patches which remove register
> > qualifiers from kern source. I did not want to spam the list with
> > 32 patches, so I'm sending them as an at
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 15:47:00 +0100, Marin Ramesa wrote:
> Attached is a gzipped series of 32 patches which remove register
> qualifiers from kern source. I did not want to spam the list with 32
> patches, so I'm sending them as an attachment.
Personally I find tarred patch series annoying
Applied, thanks!
Samuel
Hello,
Attached is a gzipped series of 32 patches which remove register
qualifiers from kern source. I did not want to spam the list with 32
patches, so I'm sending them as an attachment.
kern_remove_register.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar