le dim 24-11-2002 à 15:52, Marcus Brinkmann a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:58:45PM +0100, Olivier Péningault wrote:
> > Can you reproduce it ? What is the problem ?
>
> Which version of glibc are you using (libc0.3)? It is fixed in 2.3 and
> later.
The libc version of Debian J2. :)
I didn
le sam 23-11-2002 à 23:12, Gaël Le Mignot a écrit :
> It's a known bug, when using "rm foo/" rm contacts the node foo and asks it
> to remove "./" which, of course, doesn't work. When you use "rm foo" rm
> contacts . and asks it to remove "./foo" which can work. Well, at least it's
> what I unders
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:12:50PM +0100, Gaël Le Mignot wrote:
> It's a known bug, when using "rm foo/" rm contacts the node foo and asks it
> to remove "./" which, of course, doesn't work. When you use "rm foo" rm
> contacts . and asks it to remove "./foo" which can work. Well, at least it's
> w
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:58:45PM +0100, Olivier Péningault wrote:
> Can you reproduce it ? What is the problem ?
Which version of glibc are you using (libc0.3)? It is fixed in 2.3 and
later.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:17:46PM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> This kind of behavior actually depends on the underlying filesystem (IOW, it's
> looks more likely to be a problem in the filesystem server rather than in rm).
What I really meant to say here was something like:
It looks more like
23 Nov 2002 21:58:45 +0100, tu as dit :
> Hello,
> I send something that looks like a bug found ... using rm.
> Now, we want to delete it with rm -R;
> a) $ rm -R foo // it works as expected.
> b) $ rm -R foo/// error like below
> rm: cannot remove 'foo/': Invalid argument
> Can
Salut,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:58:45PM +0100, Olivier P?ningault wrote:
> rm: cannot remove 'foo/': Invalid argument
>
> Can you reproduce it ? What is the problem ?
This kind of behavior actually depends on the underlying filesystem (IOW, it's
looks more likely to be a problem in the filesys
Hello,
I send something that looks like a bug found ... using rm.
To reproduce it, do :
$ mkdir foo
$ touch foo/bar// optional; foo/ can be empty
Now, we want to delete it with rm -R;
a) $ rm -R foo // it works as expected.
b) $ rm -R foo/// error like below
rm: cannot remove 'foo/':
