Re: chroot in its own ext2fs?

Hi, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:22:01AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Does anybody remember precisely why chroots should have their own > ext2fs? I can build packages fine from inside a chroot which doesn't > have its own ext2fs, for instance. I don't recall why we did that, maybe it was purely

Re: chroot in its own ext2fs?

Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:15:44 +0200, a écrit : > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-02 02:22:01) > > Does anybody remember precisely why chroots should have their own > > ext2fs? I can build packages fine from inside a chroot which doesn't > > have its own ext2fs, for instance. > > I t

Re: chroot in its own ext2fs?

Hi :) Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-02 02:22:01) > Does anybody remember precisely why chroots should have their own > ext2fs? I can build packages fine from inside a chroot which doesn't > have its own ext2fs, for instance. I thought only subhurds need their own translator? Justus

chroot in its own ext2fs?

Hello, Does anybody remember precisely why chroots should have their own ext2fs? I can build packages fine from inside a chroot which doesn't have its own ext2fs, for instance. Samuel