On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Richard Braun, le Mon 26 Nov 2012 14:37:23 +0100, a écrit :
> > Right. What about the SELECT_URG/POLLPRI case ? This one looks quite
> > obscur.
>
> It is. IIRC for TCP/IP it's used for out-of-band data. I don't think we
> have an
Richard Braun, le Mon 26 Nov 2012 14:37:23 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > In the read case, the end of file will be detected by a zero-read, not
> > an EPIPE.
>
> Right. What about the SELECT_URG/POLLPRI case ? This one looks quite
> obscur.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> In the read case, the end of file will be detected by a zero-read, not
> an EPIPE.
Right. What about the SELECT_URG/POLLPRI case ? This one looks quite
obscur.
--
Richard Braun
Richard Braun, le Mon 26 Nov 2012 14:30:40 +0100, a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:55:19AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > About the behavior change, I'd tend to agree, but I'd rather get others'
> > opinion too.
> >
> > I guess what you actually want to fix is the error case on poll()?
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:55:19AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> About the behavior change, I'd tend to agree, but I'd rather get others'
> opinion too.
>
> I guess what you actually want to fix is the error case on poll()?
> (actually here the only error that can happen is EPIPE)
> (that would
Svante Signell, le Fri 23 Nov 2012 08:00:26 +0100, a écrit :
> I'm not yet fluent in
> the terminology and how to write things properly the GNU Hurd way.
Well, it's not about any "Hurd way", but simply collaborative project :)
> Yes, no errors in the select case only for poll (according to POSIX)
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 01:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 22 Nov 2012 20:29:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > @@ -231,15 +232,21 @@ S_io_select (struct sock_user *user,
> >if (valid & SELECT_READ)
> > {
> > pipe_acquire_reader (read_pipe);
> > - if (pipe_wait_re
Svante Signell, le Thu 22 Nov 2012 20:29:32 +0100, a écrit :
> @@ -231,15 +232,21 @@ S_io_select (struct sock_user *user,
>if (valid & SELECT_READ)
> {
> pipe_acquire_reader (read_pipe);
> - if (pipe_wait_readable (read_pipe, 1, 1) != EWOULDBLOCK)
> + err = pipe_wa
